Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Bioretention facilities (BRF) are widely utilized in sponge cities for stormwater management, but they face challenges in effectively controlling nitrogen due to the instability of traditional fillers. Pyrite has been extensively employed as an electron donor to enhance nitrogen removal; however, it generates by-products such as H, SO, and Fe/Fe that can pose environmental issues. Construction waste residues (CWR), consisting of waste brick and concrete, have been explored as alternative fillers, but they suffer from alkaline leaching problems. To mitigate this limitation, this study investigated the optimal packing location of a composite filler consisting of pyrite with CWR (a mixture of waste brick and concrete) within BRF, considering rainfall intensity and antecedent drying days. The synergetic pollution removal and by-product mitigate mechanism of waste residue-based composite fillers applied to BRF was elucidated through SEM and FTIR characterizations, as well as microbial community analysis. Results showed that incorporating 40% CWR in the vadose layer and 20% pyrite in the submerged layer significantly enhanced nitrogen removal while maintaining limited NO-N accumulation in BRF (exceeding 80% TN), effectively controlling effluent pH levels and by-products (total Fe and SO) concentration within acceptable limits. CWR improved NH-N and TP adsorption capacity, whereas pyrite further increased NO-N removal through autotrophic denitrification. Alkaline leaching from CWR was neutralized with H produced during autotrophic denitrification, forming Fe (oxyhydr)oxides with Fe derived from pyrite oxidation; thus, achieving acceptable pH values and total Fe concentrations. Meanwhile, the media composite strategy successfully regulated effluent SO concentration by reducing Thauera and Thiobacillus abundance. Overall, this study demonstrates that integrating CWR with pyrite into BRF can facilitate stable and efficient pollutant removal while concurrently mitigating by-product issues.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121315 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!