A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas in lower extremity hemodialysis procedures. | LitMetric

Objective: While upper arm hemodialysis access is preferred due to better patency and lower complication rates, femoral access remains necessary for certain patients. This study evaluates the patency rates of femoral hemodialysis access, specifically comparing femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG), and identifying factors affecting patency.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received femoral access at our institution from 2006 to 2022. Patency rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Risk factors influencing patency were examined through Cox regression modeling, and a comparative analysis between AVF and AVG was performed.

Results: Ninety-one patients received femoral hemodialysis access (mean age, 63 ± 11 years, 57 males). Forty-one had AVF and fifty had AVG. The overall 12-month and 24-month primary patency rates were 48% and 27%, assisted primary patency rates were 87% and 78%, and secondary rates were 90% and 89%. Subgroup analysis showed that femoral AVFs had 50% and 29% primary, 93% and 85% assisted primary, and 97% and 94% secondary patency at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Femoral AVGs demonstrated 44% and 22% primary, 82% and 73% assisted primary, and 84% and 82% secondary patency at 12 and 24 months. There was no significant difference in primary patency between femoral AVFs and AVGs (P = .858). However, the femoral AVF group had higher assisted primary patency (P < .001) and secondary patency (P = .001). Previous femoral vein catheterization on the contralateral side and infection adversely affected secondary patency (hazard ratio, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.43 - 6.07; P = .002).

Conclusion: Lower extremity hemodialysis access yields excellent secondary patency and patient survival rates, with AVF showing superior assisted primary patency and secondary patency compared to AVG. Femoral vascular access is a viable alternative when upper extremity options are exhausted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

secondary patency
24
primary patency
20
assisted primary
20
hemodialysis access
16
patency rates
16
patency
15
femoral
11
primary
9
lower extremity
8
extremity hemodialysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!