Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify causes for recurrent PLRI, compare surgical treatment options, and analyze functional outcomes following revision LUCL reconstruction.
Methods: A retrospective multicentric case analysis was conducted, including patients who underwent revision LUCL surgery due to recurrent PLRI. Demographic data, surgical techniques (for primary and revision LUCL reconstruction) and postoperative rehabilitation protocols were analyzed, and causes of failure documented. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires.
Results: A total of 37 patients with a mean age of 44.3 years (± 12.3) and a median follow-up of 40.9 months (interquartile range, 20.5-77.0) with revision LUCL surgery were included. Recurrent instability was mainly attributed to graft insufficiency or loosening (59.5%) and rupture of the humeral graft (37.8%). Failure of humeral fixation occurred in 48.7% of cases, often due to loosening or widening of the drill hole. While triceps tendon autografts were most commonly used for primary LUCL reconstruction (89.2%), triceps and hamstring tendon autografts were used in revision procedures (35.1% and 32.4%, respectively). Fixation of the humerus was most commonly performed with tenodesis screws (83.8% in primary procedures and 73.0% in revision procedures), and fixation of the ulnaris was generally performed with biceps buttons in both primary procedures (75.7%) and revision procedures (51.4%). Out of 37 patients, eight complications (21.6%) were reported following revision surgery, including three cases of recurrent instability (8.1%). The median QuickDASH score was 42.5 (IQR, 25.4-80.2), and the median PREE score was 13.0 (IQR, 1.0-41.4).
Conclusion: Revision LUCL reconstructions remain challenging. The most common causes of failure are graft insufficiency or loosening, and humeral graft rupture, resulting in recurrent PLRI. Additionally, revision LUCL reconstruction is associated with moderate to poor postoperative outcome scores and a relatively high complication rate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04201-y | DOI Listing |
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
March 2025
St. Vinzenz Kliniken Pfronten Im Allgäu, Pfronten, Germany.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify causes for recurrent PLRI, compare surgical treatment options, and analyze functional outcomes following revision LUCL reconstruction.
Methods: A retrospective multicentric case analysis was conducted, including patients who underwent revision LUCL surgery due to recurrent PLRI. Demographic data, surgical techniques (for primary and revision LUCL reconstruction) and postoperative rehabilitation protocols were analyzed, and causes of failure documented.
Oper Orthop Traumatol
August 2024
Schwerpunkt für Unfall‑, Hand- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Objective: Interposition arthroplasty of the elbow involves the interposition of a fascia lata or dermis autograft or allograft between the distal humerus and the ulna or radius, while preserving the original form of articulation.
Indications: Interposition arthroplasty is indicated for young patients with high functional demands who suffer from end-stage elbow arthritis and associated pain or joint stiffness.
Contraindications: Contraindications include acute or subacute infection, skeletal immaturity, bone loss, deformity, or gross instability.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
May 2024
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre, Regensburg, Germany; Sporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address:
Background: Surgical treatment helps to restore stability of the elbow in patients with posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). The anconeus muscle is one of the most important active stabilizers against PLRI. A minimally invasive anconeus-sparing approach for lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction using a triceps tendon autograft has been previously described.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
November 2023
Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address:
Background: Biomechanical studies have shown that translation of the proximal radius relative to the capitellum in the sagittal plane can predict integrity of the collateral ligaments in a transolecranon fracture model; no studies have examined this in clinical practice.
Methods And Materials: Nineteen consecutive transolecranon fracture dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture classifications, surgical management, and failure with instability.
J Orthop Surg Res
June 2023
German Joint Centre, ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes and return to sport metrics in recreational athletes who suffered simple elbow dislocations and were treated operatively or nonoperatively.
Methods: The study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 who were recreational athletes and had experienced a simple elbow dislocation, with at least 2 years having passed since the injury. Patient-reported outcomes including Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Subjective Elbow Value (SEV), Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!