Background: The authors investigated, via a web-based survey, the perceptions of general dentists in the United States regarding endodontists restoring endodontically treated teeth (ETT).
Methods: A 15-question survey was distributed to American Dental Association members. Participants were asked to rate their comfort with various scenarios. In the control scenario, an endodontist placed restorations without prior discussion with the general dentist. In the experimental scenario, an endodontist trained in endorestorative procedures, having previously discussed their intentions, placed the restorations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, McNemar test, and false discovery rate adjustment (P).
Results: The response rate was 48% (N = 544). General dentists were significantly more likely to accept the experimental scenario than the control scenario for post space creation (88.1% vs 84.2%; P = .026), post placement (66.7% vs 52.2%; P = 3.35e-13), and core placement (68.2% vs 55.1%; P = 2.28e-12). Overall, 69% (374) supported endodontists placing restorations after discussion with referring general dentists, 12.9% (70) disagreed, and 18.4% (100) were undecided. Opponents (67) cited lack of trust (64%) and billing preferences (18%). Undecided general dentists (83) identified residency training (28%), case portfolios (16%), and individualized discussions (13%) as factors likely to increase acceptance. More recent graduates, female practitioners, those practicing at community clinics, in rural or urban areas, and in the South or West were significantly more comfortable with endodontists placing restorations (P < .05).
Conclusions: General dentists broadly supported endodontists restoring ETT if they were trained in endorestorative procedures and after prior discussion.
Practical Implications: Endodontists should communicate their intent to restore ETT with general dentists to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2025.01.007 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparison of Pregabalin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment.
Anesth Pain Med
December 2024
Department of Pediatrics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Background: Pediatric dentists employ both pharmacological and non-pharmacological behavior control methods. Despite the use of behavioral control techniques, some young children cannot undergo treatment in the office, making sedation or general anesthesia necessary. Premedication drugs can be used before general anesthesia to reduce anxiety, control pain, induce amnesia, prevent nausea, and avert potential complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF"Lessons to Be Learned After the Storm"-A Retrospective Study on the Characteristics and Management of Dental Emergency Patients During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Riyadh.
Healthcare (Basel)
February 2025
Department of Training, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 12233, Saudi Arabia.
There is a limited understanding of the variables relating to dental patients and the treatment provided during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown in our region. This study aimed to qualitatively analyze these patient variables and determine the associations between treatment recommendations and the specialty of the doctor at the point of care. The present study was retrospective, cross-sectional, and analytical in nature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffect of Prolonged Exposure to Beverage on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials.
Pediatr Dent
January 2025
Product development specialist, St. Paul, Minn., USA.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare color stability and surface roughness of different tooth-colored restorative materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry after prolonged immersion into grape juice. Forty disc specimens were prepared using pink opaquer (PO), pink opaquer with composite resin (DUAL), composite resin (COMP), and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) of two-mm thickness. 3D-printed wells were fabricated in CD4 shade.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA comparison of the effectiveness of standard anterior bracket placement versus smile arc protection method: A randomized clinical trial.
J World Fed Orthod
March 2025
Dental Research Center, Orthodontics Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Electronic address:
Objectives: This randomized two-arm parallel trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of standard anterior bracket positioning with the smile arc protection (SAP) method in terms of occlusal and smile morphometric indices, and perceived post-treatment smile aesthetics.
Methods: Patients needing nonextraction orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to either the SAP or standard bracket placement group. Inclusion criteria were ages 11 to 25 years, nonextraction treatment, and good oral hygiene, all treated using the Roth 0.
Background: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), characterized by an obsessive focus on perceived flaws in appearance and affects approximately 0.7% through 2.4% of the general population, with dental-related concerns accounting for 20% of cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!