Background: There was a call for research regarding safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. Payor status may be an indicator of both health and socioeconomic status.
Objectives: The American College of Surgeons Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) sought to explore the association of insurance type in U.S. patients receiving primary bariatric surgery on both postoperative risks and benefits.
Setting: Not-for-profit organization, clinical data registry.
Methods: MBSAQIP data from primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) cases performed in 2021 along with follow-up records through 18 months postoperatively were included (N = 156,046). All analyses were stratified by age (<65 years, n = 149,949; ≥65 years, n = 6097). Hierarchical logistic regression models for 30-day adverse events, and longitudinal models for percent total weight loss and cox regression models for mortality and comorbidity remission rates through 1 year were performed.
Results: Among those <65 years, Medicare patients showed greatest risk for 30-day postoperative complications followed by Medicaid, private insurance, and self-pay patients aligning with preoperative risk profiles. Private insurance holders <65 years lose 1.5% more of their total preoperative weight and show greater rates of comorbidity remission at 12 months than Medicare patients. Across all payor groups <65 years, scenario-based survival probabilities through 1-year are ∼99%, 25% total weight loss or greater is realized, and 33% to over 75% of those with respective comorbidities experience remission. No meaningful payor status differences were noted among those ≥65 years.
Conclusions: Payor status may be an indicator of both health and socioeconomic status, where traditional risk adjustment is inappropriate. Results reinforce these complex relationships, but also prove immense benefits of bariatric surgery regardless of payor type.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2025.01.015 | DOI Listing |
Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg
March 2025
Clinic of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Background: Epigastric tissue abundancy after abdominoplasty or liposuction is a complicated scenario that requires a precise and targeted approach. Especially when concurrent mammoplasty is planned or has already been done by the patient, a surgical operation through a submammary skin incision can solve this problem.
Aim: To showcase our personal experience regarding reverse abdominoplasty and compare it to the state of the art.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
February 2025
Department of General Surgery, Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital.
Background: Endoscopic gastroplasty (EG) is a less invasive method for managing obesity compared with bariatric surgery. However, evidence on the use of EG is still scarce. This study aims to review existing evidence comparing EG with lifestyle modifications (LM) in terms of weight loss and improvement in metabolic syndrome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Endocrinol (Oxf)
March 2025
Department of Addiction Psychiatry, Taoyuan Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Background: Post-bariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a complex complication, often characterized by potentially severe hypoglycemic episodes and reduced hypoglycemia awareness. Recent findings suggest that autonomic dysfunction, preoperative hypoglycemia symptoms, and early dumping syndrome may each contribute to PBH risk.
Objective: To discuss critical insights from the recent study by Grover et al.
BMC Res Notes
March 2025
Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study: (a) scoped the literature for desirable characteristics of online learning environments; (b) analyzed and compared the available online systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) courses; and (c) proposed an outline for a model online systematic review SR/MA course that is aligned with PRISMA principles, and (d) charted learning outcomes, module contents, interactive elements, feedback and module assessment, and course evaluation of the proposed course. The findings highlight the many distinctive aspects and design of the proposed model course, including its comprehensiveness, alignment with PRISMA principles, self-pace and self-direction, with high interactivity levels, augmented by the expert trainer guidance ('human' factor), and individualized feedback, and its conclusion with the incorporation of the learners in virtual research teams undertaking real SR/MA. The proposed model course integrates principles of problem-based learning, where in addition to the provided resources (interactive assignments and video tutorials), trainees will be actively conducting their own real SR/MA as part of the course, while receiving expert feedback to enhance learning outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: We aimed to compare the perioperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial included adult patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Participants were randomized to receive either ibuprofen or ketorolac intravenously every 8 h.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!