A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

An innovative approach to development of new pyrazolylquinolin-2-one hybrids as dual EGFR and BRAF inhibitors. | LitMetric

Novel quinoline-based derivatives 2a-e and 4a-j have been designed and synthesized as potential antiproliferative agents. The designed compounds were screened for their antiproliferative activity against sixty cell lines according to NCI protocol. The promising hybrids 4d-g are screened by MTT assays on three cancer cell lines: leukemia (MOLT-4), lung cancer (HOP-92), and breast cancer (T47D), with IC values ranging from 4.982 ± 0.2 to 36.52 ± 1.46 µM compared to Staurosporine, with compound 4e being the most effective. Derivatives 4d-g were evaluated for their inhibitory activity on EGFR and BRAF. Compound 4e exhibited the highest inhibitory activities, with IC values of 0.055 ± 0.002 μM for EGFR and 0.068 ± 0.003 μM for BRAF, compared to the reference drugs erlotinib (IC 0.06 ± 0.002 μM) and vemurafenib (IC 0.035 ± 0.001 μM), respectively. Cell cycle analysis of the HOP-92 manifested that pre-G1 apoptosis signaling took place after 4e treatment. Docking simulations were employed to analyze the modes and scores of compounds 4d-g with respect to EGFR and BRAF. The results revealed that compound 4e exhibited strong affinity for both EGFR and BRAF compared to the reference drugs with values of - 3.226 and - 3.474 kcal/mol, respectively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11030-025-11127-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

egfr braf
16
cell lines
8
compound exhibited
8
braf compared
8
compared reference
8
reference drugs
8
egfr
5
braf
5
innovative approach
4
approach development
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!