Background: Cesarean scar defects can lead to long-term complications, such as cesarean scar disorders, cesarean scar pregnancy, and the risk of uterine scar dehiscence and rupture in subsequent pregnancy. However, the optimal closure technique to prevent the development of cesarean scar defects (CSD) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to explore whether two-layer interrupted versus two-layer continuous sutures could prevent the formation of CSD.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a single university hospital in Japan. We recruited pregnant women with ≥ 20 primary or previous cesarean sections. Participants were randomly assigned to either a two-layer interrupted or a two-layer continuous suture group. Residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and the depth of CSD were measured using sonohysterography, 6-8 months post-cesarean section. In addition, the rate of severe CSD, defined as a loss of over 50% of the myometrium, was examined.

Results: Of the 220 study participants, 43 dropped out; 89 in the interrupted group and 88 in the continuous group underwent sonohysterography. No significant difference in RMT was observed in the interrupted and continuous groups (median 8.1 [interquartile range, 6.2-9.9] mm and 7.9 [4.6-10.3] mm, respectively). However, the incidence of severe CSD in the interrupted group was significantly lower than that in the continuous group (2% versus 22%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the factors contributing to developing severe CSD were interrupted suture (odds ratio [OR]: 0.04, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.006-0.281, p = 0.0011), the difference in myometrial thickness between the fundal and cervical sides at the center of the uterine wound before suturing (OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.144-2.367, p = 0.0072), and retroversion of the uterus at 6-8 months after cesarean section (OR: 3.42, 95%CI: 1.074-10.946, p = 0.0374).

Conclusion: This study suggested that two-layer interrupted sutures are superior to two-layer continuous sutures in preventing the development of severe CSD.

Trial Registration: Clinical trial identification number: University Hospital Medical Information Network registration code, UMIN000040601. URL of the registration site: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046334 .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07353-1DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887084PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cesarean scar
20
two-layer interrupted
12
two-layer continuous
12
interrupted versus
8
versus two-layer
8
continuous sutures
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
scar defects
8
severe csd
8

Similar Publications

Background: Cesarean scar defects can lead to long-term complications, such as cesarean scar disorders, cesarean scar pregnancy, and the risk of uterine scar dehiscence and rupture in subsequent pregnancy. However, the optimal closure technique to prevent the development of cesarean scar defects (CSD) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to explore whether two-layer interrupted versus two-layer continuous sutures could prevent the formation of CSD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Overcoming extensive abdominal adhesions: Utilizing mini-wound techniques for successful laparoscopic staging in cancer surgery.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol

March 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Objective: Using an ultra-mini-wound technique to dissect the adhesion surrounding the umbilicus port site aiding laparoscopic staging surgery for treating a woman with an early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (E-EC) who had widespread and extensive abdominal adhesions secondary to the previous complicated cesarean section (C/S) and bladder rupture.

Case Report: A 70-year-old woman with a history of a previous C/S and complicating bladder rupture treated with the Boari flap repair, leaving a longitudinal depressed scar over the abdomen from the umbilicus site to pubic hair area in her 30s was scheduled for laparoscopic staging surgery due to early-stage E-EC. We performed an ultra-mini midline incision (3-cm) crossing the umbilicus to manually dissect the adhesion surrounding the umbilicus and inserted the main trocar port to establish the workplace for further laparoscopic staging surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. Lack of timely CSP treatment can lead to severe postpartum bleeding, affect fertility, and threaten patients' life and health.

Aim: This work explored the use of laparoscopic temporary uterine artery blocking (TUAB) and uterine artery embolization (UAE) in treating CSP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEP) are a rare type of ectopic pregnancy. This condition occurs when a blastocyst is implanted in the scar left by a previous cesarean section (C-section). CSEP can lead to a risk of maternal hemorrhage, which in severe cases can lead to maternal mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 Amniotic fluid and amnion membranes have been used in surgery specialties to improve wound healing and decrease surgical adhesion formation.  The objective was to determine if amniotic fluid could be collected at cesarean delivery and then reapplied to the layers of the closure using the CeaLogic Specimen Collection and Ratio Applicator Kit.  Twenty pregnant individuals who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!