Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: There is a paucity of knowledge on disease phenotype and outcome of very early-onset (VEO) inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) from recently developed and developing countries, including from Southeast Asia. We studied disease phenotype, clinical characteristics, management and outcome of VEO-IBD in South and Southeast Asian children.
Materials And Methods: We extracted data from a multicentre Asian pediatric (onset <18 years) IBD registry. VEO- and later-onset pediatric (LO-p) IBD were defined as onset of disease <6 years and ≥6 years, respectively. We excluded monogenic IBD.
Results: Of 440 children with IBD cases; 112 (25.5%) were VEO-IBD; Crohn's disease (CD) 36 (32.1%); ulcerative colitis (UC) 68 (60.7%), and IBD-unspecified 7 (7.1%). UC was more common in VEO-IBD while CD more common in LO-pIBD (CD = 68.9% vs. UC = 25.9%; < 0.001). Disease location/extent of disease and disease severity were similar in both age groups for both CD and UC. For CD, inflammatory disease behavior was equally common in both age group (77.8% in VEO-IBD vs. 76.6% of LO-pIBD), majority had isolated colonic disease (27.8% VEO-IBD vs. 36.3% LO-pIBD), while stricturing and penetrating diseases were not observed in VEO-CD, but noted in 4.9% and 8.4% of LO-pCD, respectively. Among UC cases, pancolitis was observed in 60.3% of VEO-IBD vs. 65.9% of LO-pIBD. Most UC never had severe disease regardless of age group. Five years after diagnosis, VEO-IBD were more likely to have corticosteroids, immunomodulators or biologics than LO-pIBD. Despite this, inactive/mild disease activity was the predominant outcome at 5 year follow up for both VEO-CD (98.2%) and VEO- UC (96.1%). Bowel surgery rate was 2.4% and 1.7% for VEO- and LO-IBD at 5 years, respectively.
Conclusions: Despite differences in disease phenotype at diagnosis, disease behaviour, location/extent and disease severity were similar between VEO- and LO-IBD, with a comparable overall clinical remission rates between both age groups at 5 years after diagnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882516 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1487253 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!