A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Proposing a machine learning-based model for predicting nonreassuring fetal heart. | LitMetric

The capacity to forecast nonreassuring fetal heart (NFH) is essential for minimizing perinatal complications; therefore, this research aims to establish if a machine learning (ML) model can predict NFH. This was a retrospective analysis of information gathered from singleton cases over the gestational age of 28 weeks that sought vaginal delivery between January 2020 and January 2022. The information was acquired from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network."A predictive model was built using four statistical ML models (decision tree classification, random forest classification, extreme gradient boost classification, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Because of the limited studies on the identification of NFH predictors, we decided to use the Chi-Square test to compare demographic, obstetric, maternal, and neonatal factors to identify NFH predictors. Then, all variables with p-values less than 0.05 were considered potential NFH predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were measured to evaluate their diagnostic performance. The incidence of NFH in our study population was 9.2%. Based on our findings NFH was more common in cases of intrauterine growth restriction, late-term, post-term, and preterm births, preeclampsia, placenta abruption, primiparous, induced labor, male fetus, and lower in birth with the presence of doula support. Random forest classification (AUROC: 0.77), decision tree classification and extreme gradient boost classification (AUROC: 0.76), and permutation feature classification with K-nearest neighbors (AUROC: 0.77), all showed good performance in predicting NFH. The higher performance belonged to random forest classification with an accuracy of 0.77 and precision of 0.72. Although this study found that the classification tree models performed well in predicting NFH, more research is needed to make a better conclusion on the performance of ML models in predicting NFH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885418PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92810-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

random forest
12
forest classification
12
nfh predictors
12
predicting nfh
12
nfh
10
classification
10
nonreassuring fetal
8
fetal heart
8
maternal neonatal
8
decision tree
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!