A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Identifying deleterious noncoding variation through gain and loss of CTCF binding activity. | LitMetric

Identifying deleterious noncoding variation through gain and loss of CTCF binding activity.

Am J Hum Genet

Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Digital Genomic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address:

Published: February 2025

CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) regulates gene expression through DNA binding at thousands of genomic loci. Genetic variation in these CTCF binding sites (CBSs) is an important driver of phenotypic variation, yet extracting those that are likely to have functional consequences in whole-genome sequencing remains challenging. To address this, we develop a hypothesis-driven framework to identify and prioritize CBS variants in gnomAD. We synthesize CTCF's binding patterns at 1,063,878 genomic loci across 214 biological contexts into a summary of binding activity. We find that high binding activity significantly correlates with both conserved nucleotides (Pearson R = 0.35, p < 2.2 × 10) and sequences that contain high-quality CTCF binding motifs (Pearson R = 0.63, p = 2.9 × 10). We then use binding activity to evaluate high-confidence allelic binding predictions for 1,253,329 single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) in gnomAD that disrupt a CBS. We find a strong, positive relationship between the mutability-adjusted proportion of singletons (MAPS) metric and the loss of CTCF binding at loci with high in vitro activity (Pearson R = 0.74, p < 2.2 × 10). To contextualize these findings, we apply MAPS to other functional classes of variation and find that a subset of 339,380 loss of CTCF binding variants is observed as infrequently as missense variants are. This work nominates these thousands of rare, noncoding variants that disrupt CTCF binding for further functional studies while providing a blueprint for prioritizing variation in other transcription factor binding sequences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.02.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

binding activity
12
ctcf binding
8
genomic loci
8
binding
7
identifying deleterious
4
deleterious noncoding
4
noncoding variation
4
variation gain
4
gain loss
4
loss ctcf
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!