Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a significant complication following esophagectomy. AL affects 8%-17% of patients and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. To this date, no consensus exists on the most optimal treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the most effective treatment approach. A systematic search of Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases was conducted. Only studies reporting on the treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for cancer were included. Studies investigating other esophageal disorders or failing to report the location of the anastomosis were excluded. The methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Out of 12,966 identified studies, 38 were included for analysis after removing duplicates and screening titles, abstracts, and full texts. Of these, five were found to be of poor methodological quality and 33 were of moderate quality. The most researched treatment methods were Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT), naso-fistula tube drainage (NFTD), and stent treatment. The success and mortality rates for EVT were 82% and 10.7%, for NFTD, 94% and 5.2%, and, for stent treatment, 75.1% and 13.5%, respectively. AL can be effectively treated with EVT, stent treatment, and NFTD. The NFTD approach appeared to have a higher success rate and lower mortality than other treatment modalities. However, it requires a longer treatment duration. Due to limitations within the included studies, a definitive recommendation regarding the optimal treatment for AL cannot be made.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anastomotic leakage
12
stent treatment
12
treatment
11
treatment intrathoracic
8
intrathoracic anastomotic
8
leakage esophagectomy
8
systematic review
8
optimal treatment
8
included studies
8
methodological quality
8

Similar Publications

Background: Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) has been proposed as a strategy to manage the complications associated with biliary obstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. However, the efficacy and safety of PBD in remain controversial, even in clinical guidelines. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of PBD in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gastric cancer is the most common malignancy of the digestive system and surgical resection is the primary treatment. Advances in surgical technology have reduced the risk of complications after radical gastrectomy; however, post-surgical pancreatic fistula remain a serious issue. These fistulas can lead to abdominal infections, anastomotic leakage, increased costs, and pain; thus, early diagnosis and prevention are crucial for a better prognosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Microbial Pathogen Spectrum in Anastomotic Leaks after Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.

Surg Infect (Larchmt)

March 2025

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany.

Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy cause significant morbidity and mortality. In addition to their early detection and prompt endoscopic or surgical management, providing adequate antimicrobial agents is a fundamental aspect of therapy. In this study, different types of microbiological samples were analyzed to provide insight into the microbial pathogen spectrum of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The mesentery might be involved in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease (CD). As a result of scarce and conflicting data, it is debatable whether removal during intestinal resections could influence postsurgical outcome. We aimed to investigate the association between the extent of mesenteric excision during intestinal resections and postoperative complications and recurrence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: an affiliated study of a multicenter snapshot study.

Surg Endosc

March 2025

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, State Key Lab of Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.

Background: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (RHC) is the primary surgical approach for right-sided colon cancer. Different ileo-colonic anastomosis techniques may lead to varied postoperative outcomes. This study aims to compare intracorporeal versus extracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis post laparoscopic RHC for short-term outcomes in right-sided colon cancer patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!