A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery for rectal cancer. | LitMetric

Objective: We investigated how Japanese D3 dissection with left colic artery (LCA) preservation affects anastomotic leakage after anterior resection with anastomosis for rectal cancer, based on the leak rate. The correlation between LCA preservation, survival, and cancer recurrence after resection was also analyzed.

Summary And Background Data: It remains unclear how LCA preservation affects the anastomotic leak rate and oncological outcomes after resection remains unclear. Some reports suggested that anastomotic leakage increases local recurrence and decreases cancer-specific survival.

Methods: In this study, we enrolled and analyzed 457 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancer in the period October 2011 through December 2016. The attending surgeon decided preoperatively and registered whether to preserve the LCA. This trial was registered under the UMIN-CTR Identifier UMIN000006160.

Results: D3 with LCA preservation was successfully completed in 218 (89.3%) of the 244 patients registered in this group, whereas D3 without LCA preservation was successfully completed in all 213 patients registered in this group. After propensity score matching, the anastomotic leakage rate was 7.86% (11/140) after D3 with LCA preservation and 7.14% (10/140) after D3 without LCA preservation. The overall survival rates were 90.1% and 89.3%, and the recurrence-free survival rates were 77.6% and 77.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that LCA preservation has no effect on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection with anastomosis using DST and that oncological outcomes may not be affected.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877326PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12869DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lca preservation
32
anastomotic leakage
16
rectal cancer
12
preservation
9
lca
9
left colic
8
colic artery
8
preservation anastomotic
8
resection anastomosis
8
leak rate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!