A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Risk stratification of residual abscess after surgical treatment for gastroduodenal perforation. | LitMetric

Aims: Residual abscess is a major complication after emergency surgery for gastroduodenal (GD) perforation. However, there is little evidence regarding potential risk factors contributing to its development. Establishing a risk stratification strategy would be valuable for the entire management process.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 115 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GD perforation between 2010 and 2023 at a secondary emergency care hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of residual abscesses. Potential risk factors for abscess formation were evaluated from various aspects.

Results: The incidence of residual abscesses was 19.1% (22 of 115). Multivariable analysis revealed that current use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (odds ratio [OR] 3.76,  = 0.037), cancer chemotherapy (OR 13.56,  = 0.005), and preoperative renal dysfunction (OR 4.72,  = 0.018) were independent predictors. A potential scoring model could be created using these three parameters, and the number of risk factors correlated with the likelihood of developing a residual abscess (0 vs. 1 vs. ≥2; 6.2% vs. 29.4% vs. 50.0%,  < 0.001). From a bacteriological point of view, the presence of in the ascites culture was closely related to its occurrence with 100% probability. Moreover, regarding early detection of this complication, C-reactive protein on postoperative d 5 had the highest predictive ability with an area under the curve of 0.818.

Conclusion: The risk of residual abscess formation after surgical treatment of GD perforation can be assessed utilizing both preoperative and postoperative information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877338PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12877DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residual abscess
12
risk factors
12
risk stratification
8
gastroduodenal perforation
8
potential risk
8
residual abscesses
8
risk
5
residual
5
stratification residual
4
abscess
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!