Performance validation of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel using simulated samples in low endemic regions.

Parasites Hosts Dis

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.

Published: February 2025

Molecular diagnostics are essential for detecting intestinal parasites, but evaluating clinical samples from low endemic areas, including Korea, is challenging. We tested the performance of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel in simulated samples for clinical use. Simulated samples were prepared with residual stool samples to confirm the diagnostic performance of the kits. Standard materials for Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba histolytica were obtained for assessment. Limit of detection was determined by diluting standard materials into multiple concentrations and testing each in duplicate. Repeatability was assessed by retesting all samples twice. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing BD MAX System results with intended results. The limit of detection values obtained using standard materials were 781 cysts/ml, 6,250 oocysts/ml, and 125 DNA copies/ml for G. lamblia, C. parvum, and E. histolytica, respectively. Simulated G. lamblia-positive stool samples with concentrations above 6,250 cysts/ml consistently yielded positive results (100% concordance). However, C. parvum-positive stool samples at 6,250 oocysts/ml showed 50% concordance initially and 75% after retesting. At 62,500 oocysts/ml, the concordance rates were 89% initially and 100% after retesting. Overall agreement was 95.2%, but that for C. parvum was relatively low (82.4%). The diagnostic performances were 87.8% of sensitivity and 100% of specificity. Despite the limited clinical samples, BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel showed good performance for clinical use, and spiked samples proved useful for evaluating protozoan PCR in low-incidence regions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/PHD.24071DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

max enteric
12
enteric parasite
12
parasite panel
12
simulated samples
12
stool samples
12
standard materials
12
samples
10
panel simulated
8
samples low
8
low endemic
8

Similar Publications

Molecular diagnostics are essential for detecting intestinal parasites, but evaluating clinical samples from low endemic areas, including Korea, is challenging. We tested the performance of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel in simulated samples for clinical use. Simulated samples were prepared with residual stool samples to confirm the diagnostic performance of the kits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The species most frequently causing campylobacteriosis are Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, followed by Campylobacter fetus, Campylobacter upsaliensis, and Campylobacter lari. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be used to detect Campylobacter DNA in stool samples, PCR assays are often validated for C. jejuni and C.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Azithromycin is the only oral option available for XDR enteric fever. Studies correlating azithromycin levels with treatment success are rare.

Methods: Serum azithromycin levels after administration of a once-daily 20 mg/kg dose for 7 days were measured in a single-centre prospective cohort of 25 consecutive adults with blood culture-positive enteric fever.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Retrospective analysis and clinical performance of BD MAX enteric pathogen testing with a focus on reliable identification of vibrio species in stool samples.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

April 2025

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Infectious diarrhea is a significant health concern, particularly for immunocompromised and pediatric patients. Traditional stool culture methods are labor-intensive and often lack sensitivity, prompting clinical laboratories to adopt PCR-based gastrointestinal pathogen panels (GIPPs). This study evaluated the BD MAX™ GIPP compared to traditional methods, focusing on the accuracy of the platform's automatic interpretations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study investigated the effects of different protein sources on feed intake, nutrient, and energy utilization, growth performance, and enteric methane (CH4) emissions in growing beef cattle, also evaluated against a pasture-based diet. Thirty-two Holstein × Angus growing beef were allocated to four dietary treatments: a total mixed ration (TMR) including solvent-extracted soybean meal as the main protein source (n = 8), TMR with local brewers' spent grains (n = 8), TMR with local field beans (n = 8), and a diet consisting solely of fresh-cut Italian ryegrass (GRA; n = 8). Every 4 wk, animals were moved to digestibility stalls within respiration chambers to measure nutrient intakes, energy and nitrogen (N) utilization, and enteric CH4 emissions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!