Mitral regurgitation (MR) or tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is often an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Our study aims to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes in patients with and without concomitant MR or isolated TR. Using the national readmission database (2016-2020), we identified patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. We used multivariable regression for adjusted analysis and the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model. Among 315,163 hospitalizations for TAVI, 14,577 (4.6 %) had concomitant MR, while 3859 (1.2 %) had isolated TR. On PSM, TAVI in concomitant MR was associated with higher acute CHF (50.1 % vs 43.7 %, p-value < 0.001), mechanical circulatory support (MCS) need (1.5 % vs 0.9 %, p-value: 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (5.6 % vs. 4.3 %, p-value < 0.001) and net adverse events (61.5 % vs. 59.2 %, p-value: 0.002) while the mortality difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Higher total costs ($58,104 vs $55,183, p-value < 0.001), 90- (22.8 % vs. 21.2 %), and 180-day readmission rates (32.1 % vs. 29.4 %) were also observed [p-value < 0.05]. Similarly, TAVI in the presence of isolated TR was associated with higher cardiogenic shock (3.2 % vs. 1.8 %, p: 0.004) and MCS need (1.5 % vs 0.7 %, p: 0.009). TAVI with coexisting TR showed higher rates of 30-day (13.4 % vs. 11.2 %), 90-day (26 % vs. 21.2 %), and 180-day (34.3 % vs 29.1 %) readmission rates [p < 0.05]. A higher median length of stay (3 vs. 2 days) and total cost ($60,376 vs. $55,183) [p-value < 0.001] were also observed. TAVI in concomitant MR or TR was associated with higher periprocedural adverse events, increased healthcare burden & readmission rates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.02.008 | DOI Listing |
Front Cardiovasc Med
February 2025
Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Two years ago, the patient suffered from type A aortic dissection. As a result, partial aortic dissection artificial vascular replacement and partial aortic arch artificial vascular replacement were performed. Six months after the operation, an anastomotic fistula in the ascending aorta was detected, which subsequently progressed to chronic heart failure of New York Heart Association (NYHA grade) class III.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
February 2025
Cardiovascular Disease, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, USA.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has significantly improved in treating aortic valve disease in recent years, particularly in patients at high surgical risk. This case report describes an 80-year-old woman who had severe aortic stenosis previously treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and six years later had a valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVI who developed severe symptomatic restenosis of the bioprosthetic aortic valve five years later of the last procedure. A third valve-in-valve-in-valve (ViViV) TAVI using a 26-mm Sapien 3 valve was performed due to the high surgical risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKardiol Pol
March 2025
Clinical Department of Interventional Cardiology, St. John Paul II Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
J Am Coll Cardiol
March 2025
Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address:
This updated Heart Valve Collaboratory framework addresses the growing concern for transcatheter valve failure (TVF) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). With the increasing volume of redo-TAV and surgical TAV explantation, there is a critical need for standardized pathways and protocols for evaluating TVF using echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography. This document clarifies prior definitions of bioprosthetic valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure in a practical, imaging directed context for TAVR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan J Cardiol
March 2025
Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Background: The use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis is expanding to patients across the entire spectrum of surgical risk. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in trials enrolling lower risk patients.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety and efficacy outcomes between TAVI and SAVR among lower risk patients (mean/median STS score <4).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!