Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Int J Pharm
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, Kingsville TX 78363, USA. Electronic address:
Published: March 2025
Ophthalmic emulsions are considered complex drug products due to their unique product characteristics, presence of multiple phases as aqueous, swollen micellar and oil phases resulting in a complex drug release pattern. FDA recommends in vivo pharmacokinetic or clinical end point study; or in vitro comparative physicochemical characterization study to demonstrate similarity between the reference and generic products. Purpose of the current investigation is to develop a comprehensive biowaiver approach to assess performance of the nanoemullsions of difluprednate through testing their critical quality attributes (CQA). CQA of the Q1/Q2 formulations such as viscosity, pH, globule size distribution, drug distribution in different phases of emulsion, and in vitro release were tested. Drug and surfactant distribution in various phases was analyzed using UPLC following phase separation by ultracentrifugation. In vitro drug release testing (IVRT) was performed using Franz diffusion and microdialysis methods. Microdialysis method was developed and validated by studying the drug release from Q1/Q2 formulations compared to that of the reference product. Of the two IVRT methods used in the current study, the conventional Franz diffusion cell method served as quality control dissolution method with about 80 % drug release in ≅ 2.5 h, differentiating the drug release profiles between the micelle, emulsions of different globule size distribution. In contrast, microdialysis served as a biorelevant method that can be used to test the drug release as early as 2 min with reproducibility and discriminatory ability. It is likely that the above biowaiver approach using a series of product characterization tests and microdialysis as a bio-relevant IVRT method support the industry in generic product development and in establishing in vitro bioequivalence of complex ophthalmic products.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125431 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!
© LitMetric 2025. All rights reserved.