Impacts of dairy forage management on soil carbon change and net-zero accounting.

J Dairy Sci

Plant Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Saint Paul, MN, USA.

Published: March 2025

The US Dairy Industry has pledged to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 2050, but reliance on corn (Zea mays L.) silage as a primary forage source undermines progress toward this goal. Soils managed for corn silage production are a significant source of carbon (C) emissions to the atmosphere, with the soil C losses ranging from 3.7 to 7.0 Mg C ha yr (13.5 to 25.6 Mg CO ha yr) reported in the literature. However, biogenic emissions from soil C loss are not typically represented within C-footprints or life cycle inventories. Using an example dairy farm, we demonstrate that including emissions associated with soil C losses under dairy forage production can increase the C-footprint of milk nearly 2-fold. We suggest that this approach represents a more accurate estimate of the emissions impact of milk production, and that gains in the GHG efficiency of milk have come, in part, at the expense of soil C where forage rotations are predominated by silage corn. The C balance of forage production systems can likely be improved with advanced manure management technologies and application strategies that return more manurial C to the soil while minimizing N and P loading. However, we argue that more extensive changes to forage cropping systems will also be required. Expanding the role of perennials and winter annual crops in forage rotations; breeding forages with greater yield, persistence, and deeper more extensive root systems; and additional creative solutions to retain more plant-derived C in soils are necessary to balance soil C budgets and achieve net-zero emissions targets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25796DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dairy forage
8
soil losses
8
forage production
8
forage rotations
8
forage
7
soil
7
emissions
6
impacts dairy
4
forage management
4
management soil
4

Similar Publications

Nutrition impacts the epigenetic signature, including DNA methylation. The aim of this study was to identify genomic regions differentially methylated in the rumen of Italian Mediterranean dairy buffaloes fed green forage [Total Mixed Ration (TMR) + ryegrass green feed (30% of diet)] compared to those receiving a standard TMR diet, through Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing. We found 6571 differentially methylated genomic regions (DMRs), 51.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impacts of dairy forage management on soil carbon change and net-zero accounting.

J Dairy Sci

March 2025

Plant Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Saint Paul, MN, USA.

The US Dairy Industry has pledged to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 2050, but reliance on corn (Zea mays L.) silage as a primary forage source undermines progress toward this goal. Soils managed for corn silage production are a significant source of carbon (C) emissions to the atmosphere, with the soil C losses ranging from 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Forage may boost dairy calf health, yet findings vary. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess forage's impact on serum biomarkers, fecal scores, diarrhea, and feeding habits, reviewing 29 studies from 2000 to 2023 across Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and X-Mol. The results showed that forage supplementation increased the concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) in the postweaning calves.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The objective was to evaluate the response of New Zealand Holstein cows to concentrate supplementation at contrasting times of the day on herbage intake and ingestive behavior. Two experiments were conducted in winter and spring-summer in a grazing dairy production system of Medicago sativa L. with Dactylis glomerata L.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Increasing forage proportion (FP) in the diets of dairy cows would reduce competition for human edible foods and reduce feed costs, particularly in low-input systems. However, increasing FP reduces productivity and may increases methane (CH) emission parameters. This work aimed to investigate the impact of FP and breed on feed efficiency and CH emission parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!