Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The impact of an amputation on the intact limb during walking is still unclear. By using vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF), recent reports suggested that not all amputees exhibit the classical M-shape. However, there is no study exploring these "Non-M" strides on both feet. The purpose of present study was to explore the vGRF time-course during gait and to quantify "Non-M" strides, their reproducibility and factors that could influence their apparition.
Methods: vGRF of 29 controls and 23 unilateral lower-limb amputees were recorded during a 5-min walk at comfortable speed on an instrumented treadmill. Each stride was classified as "M" or "Non-M" to determine the percentage of "Non-M" strides per limb that were then compared between groups and limbs. The influence of age, time since amputation, speed, stance phase ASI, and type of prosthetic foot on the percentage of "Non-M" strides was tested. Comparisons between intact and prosthetic sides were made for duration of the stance phase and variability of vGRF patterns.
Results: the percentage of "Non-M" strides was higher in the amputee group (p < 0.001) and higher in the intact limb compared to the prosthetic limb (p < 0.001). The analysis of the variables that could influence vGRF did not identify a cause. The amputees who also produced "Non-M" strides had higher variability in their vGRF patterns on the intact limb compared to those producing only "M" strides. This was not observed on the prosthetic side.
Significance: The results suggest that the intact limb adapts in real-time to manage the body's movements, compensating for limits of prosthetic footwear. The global time-course of the vGRF (rather than the first peak) is a useful tool for studying the impact of the prosthesis on the intact limb.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.020 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!