A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Facial cooling improves thermal perceptions and maintains the interleukin-6 response during passive heating: A sex comparison. | LitMetric

Passively elevating body temperature can trigger a potentially beneficial acute inflammatory response. However, heat therapy often causes discomfort and negative thermal perceptions, particularly in females who generally have lower heat tolerance than males. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of facial cooling on thermal comfort and interleukin-6 concentration in response to 60 minutes of dry heat exposure, and to investigate sex differences in physiological responses and perceptions. 22 healthy young adults (10 females, 12 males; age: 24.4 ± 3.3 years) completed three trials in randomized order using a dry sauna device: 1) Hyperthermia (71.1 ± 1.9°C; HEAT), 2) Hyperthermia with facial cooling via fans (71.1 ± 3.0°C; FAN), and 3) Normothermia (27.0 ± 0.9°C; CON). Blood samples to determine interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentration were collected before and after exposure; basic affect and thermal comfort, rectal and skin temperature were assessed throughout the intervention. Rectal temperature following HEAT (38.0 ± 0.3°C) and FAN (37.8 ± 0.3°C) did not differ between males and females ( = 0.57). Females had higher forehead skin temperatures than males ( ≤ 0.019). Thermal comfort remained more positive in FAN compared to HEAT ( ≤ 0.002). Females felt more thermal discomfort than males in HEAT ( ≤ 0.03), but not in FAN ( = 0.28). The increase in IL-6 plasma concentration was similar between HEAT and FAN ( = 1.00), and higher than CON ( ≤ 0.02); there was no difference between males and females ( = 0.69). This study showed that facial cooling alleviated the thermal discomfort during heat exposure, particularly benefitted females, and did not impede the acute IL-6 response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875509PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2024.2406730DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial cooling
16
thermal comfort
12
heat
9
thermal perceptions
8
heat exposure
8
il-6 plasma
8
plasma concentration
8
males females
8
thermal discomfort
8
thermal
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!