Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This paper explores the evolving landscape of Electromyogram (EMG) signal analysis, focusing on the growing prominence of deep learning (DL) algorithms for hand, wrist, and finger movement recognition. Such algorithms often come with high computational costs, potentially limiting the clinical translation on resource-limited devices and igniting more research on reduced complexity models. This prompts the question: is it time to shift the algorithmic focus in EMG pattern recognition, given the reported performance of some light-weight traditional or hybrid methods emphasizing synergy between different EMG signals? A comparative study is implemented between state-of-the-art deep learning extension for time series classification, denoted as Random Convolutional Kernel Transform (ROCKET), and simple, yet effective pattern recognition methods tailored to exploit basic forms of EMG signal synergies- Waveform Length Phasors (WLPHASOR), Root-Mean-Squared Phasor (RMSPHASOR), and the proposed novel Multi-Signal Waveform Length (MSWL). Tests are conducted on EMG data from 22 participants performing 11 hand and wrist movements using two EMG armbands (10 and 8 channels, respectively), utilizing the open-source LibEMG toolbox. Preliminary findings suggest that, while DL algorithms exhibit formidable capabilities, the performance gap with traditional EMG feature extraction methods may not be as substantial as anticipated. The observations of this study revealed no significant differences in average accuracies between ROCKET, WLPHASOR, and RMSPHASOR (87% average across participants). Furthermore, MSWL significantly enhances performance to 90%, and the combination of ROCKET+MSWL achieves 91% on average across all subjects. These findings challenge the narrative of DL dominance in EMG pattern recognition, urging a re-evaluation of the algorithmic focus and contributing valuable insights to the debate on information extraction from EMG signals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782511 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!