Background: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare but potentially serious pregnancy complication. The use of bromocriptine in addition to standard treatment has been recommended; however, the evidence supporting its efficacy remains limited.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across 4 databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception to September 13, 2024, without language restrictions. The inclusion criteria were studies that compared the efficacy of bromocriptine in addition to standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in PPCM patients and reported outcomes on LVEF, LV function recovery, all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and thromboembolism.
Results: There were 11 studies included in this meta-analysis, involving 1706 participants. Bromocriptine was associated with a greater ΔLVEF (Post-Pretreatment LVEF) compared to the control group, with a mean difference (MD) of 10.03 % (95 %CI 3.88 % to 16.17 %), p < 0.01. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that bromocriptine was associated with increased ΔLVEF compared to the control group only in the subgroup with baseline LVEF<30. Bromocriptine was associated with a significantly higher post-treatment LVEF compared to standard treatment alone, with an MD of 8.50 % (95 %CI 3.39 % to 13.61 %), p < 0.01. Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that bromocriptine was associated with higher post-treatment LVEF regardless of study design and baseline LVEF. There was no significant difference in LV function recovery, all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, NYHA class III/IV, MACE, and thromboembolism.
Conclusions: Bromocriptine is associated with greater ΔLVEF improvement and higher post-treatment LVEF compared to standard treatment alone in PPCM.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133105 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Efficacy of a Supervised Exercise Program on Pain, Physical Function, and Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.
JMIR Res Protoc
March 2025
Paseo de los Encomendadores, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Treatments for this disease often result in side effects such as pain, fatigue, loss of muscle mass, and reduced quality of life. Physical exercise has been shown to effectively mitigate these side effects and improve the quality of life in patients with breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrinary Biomarkers and Attainment of Cefepime Therapeutic Targets in Critically Ill Children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
March 2025
From the Department of Pediatrics.
Background: Critically ill children are at risk for subtherapeutic antibiotic concentrations. The frequency of target attainment and risk factors for subtherapeutic concentrations of cefepime in children have not been extensively studied.
Methods: We performed an observational study in critically ill children receiving a new prescription of standard dosing of cefepime for suspected sepsis (≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria within 48 hours of cefepime start).
Seizures, Driver Licensure, and Medical Reporting Update: An AAN Position Statement.
Neurology
April 2025
School of Law, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
This consensus position statement of the American Academy of Neurology, American Epilepsy Society, and Epilepsy Foundation of America updates prior 1994 and 2007 position statements on seizures, driver licensure, and medical reporting. Key consensus positions include the following: (1) in the United States, national driving standards promulgated through a system such as the Uniform Law Commission would reduce confusion and improve adherence with state driving standards; (2) state licensing criteria for medical conditions should be promulgated by regulations and guidelines based on enabling legislation rather than in statutes themselves and should be developed by medical advisory boards working in collaboration with departments of motor vehicles; (3) licensing criteria should be equitable, nondiscriminatory, objective, and compatible with comparable risks in other populations; (4) a minimum seizure-free interval of 3 months should ordinarily be required before driving in all cases and should be extended in individual cases based on review of favorable and unfavorable features by medical advisory boards; (5) individuals with exclusively provoked seizures attributable to provoking factors that are unlikely to reoccur in the future may not require a seizure-free interval before resuming driving; (6) individuals with previously well-controlled epilepsy who experience seizures due to short-term interruptions of antiseizure medications in the setting of hospitalization or practitioner-directed medication-titration may not require a seizure-free interval before driving once previously effective levels of antiseizure medications have been resumed; (7) patients and practitioners should pause driving during tapering and following discontinuation of an antiseizure medication if another such medication is not introduced; (8) individuals whose cognition or coordination is impaired due to medications used to prevent seizures should refrain from driving; (9) health care practitioners should be allowed but not mandated to report drivers who pose an elevated risk; but (10) neither a decision to report a patient suspected of being at elevated risk nor a decision declining to report a patient suspected of being at elevated risk should be subject to legal liability; (11) nations, states, and municipalities should provide alternative methods of transportation and accommodations for individuals whose driving privileges are restricted due to medical conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: In Germany, the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury is approximately 16 per million inhabitants per year. This article aims to present evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic measures for the first 14 days after injury to minimize neural damage, prevent complications, and preserve functioning as much as possible.
Methods: After the formulation of key questions, systematic literature searches were carried out on multiple topics.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections as a second-line treatment in patients with tendinopathy-related chronic pain and failure of conservative treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pain Med
March 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boul. Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Design: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a popular treatment option in managing chronic tendinopathies, although the literature is inconsistent, mainly because of significant heterogeneity in patient populations. Patients who failed conservative management may respond differently than those who have not undergone first-line treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PRP injections in reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic tendinopathy who failed conservative treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!