Background: Intercostal EV-ICD leads may work better inn contact with the pericardium thereby directing pacing and defibrillation energy toward excitable myocytes. We report three-month safety and performance outcomes with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead paired with standard, commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs).

Methods: Subjects undergoing a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) procedure received a concomitant intercostal EV-ICD lead system. The intercostal EV-ICD lead was connected sequentially to a PG in a left pectoral and then a left mid-axillary location. EV-ICD lead assessment included sensing and defibrillation of induced ventricular arrhythmias (IVA) and pacing capture. The intercostal EV-ICD system was followed in a "recording only" mode and the control TV-ICD system in "therapy delivery" mode to compare stored events. Devices were evaluated prior to hospital discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months post implant. Defibrillation testing was repeated prior to lead removal.

Results: 20/20(100%) were successfully implanted (median implant time of 9 minutes). Two major lead complications were reported over a mean of 82 days: (1) lead movement and (2) infection of both the TV-ICD and EV-ICD systems. Intraoperative pacing capture was achieved with the integrated bipolar configuration in 19 of 20 (95%) subjects. Pacing capture with the EV-ICD system was tolerated in all subjects, with over 90% feeling no pain after a one-month recovery from the procedure. Induced VF episodes were sensed in all subjects and defibrillated successfully in 17 of 17 patients (100%) with a left mid-axillary PG and 19 of 20 patients (95%) with a left pectoral PG. Sensing and defibrillation were successful in 18 of 18 (100%) tested prior to lead removal.

Conclusions: In this pilot experience with a second generation intercostal EV-ICD lead implantation, sensing and defibrillation of induced VF was successful when paired with a standard ICD PG from either a left midaxillary or pectoral pocket.

Study Identifier: NCT Number: NCT05791032, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05791032.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intercostal ev-icd
24
ev-icd lead
20
sensing defibrillation
16
pacing capture
12
lead
10
ev-icd
9
second-generation intercostal
8
paired standard
8
left pectoral
8
left mid-axillary
8

Similar Publications

Background: Intercostal EV-ICD leads may work better inn contact with the pericardium thereby directing pacing and defibrillation energy toward excitable myocytes. We report three-month safety and performance outcomes with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead paired with standard, commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs).

Methods: Subjects undergoing a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) procedure received a concomitant intercostal EV-ICD lead system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quantifying Cardiothoracic Variation with Posture and Respiration to Inform Cardiac Device Design.

Cardiovasc Eng Technol

February 2023

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 575 N. Patterson Ave. Suite 530, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA.

Purpose: With extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads placed beneath the sternum, it is important to quantify heart motion relative to the rib cage with postural changes and respiration.

Methods: MRI scans from five males and five females were collected in upright and supine postures at end inspiration [n = 10 each]. Left and right decubitus [n = 8 each] and prone [n = 5] MRIs at end inspiration and supine MRIs at end expiration [n = 5] were collected on a subset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!