A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Suture Removal Timing and its Effect on Root Coverage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate the impact of suture removal timing on the clinical outcomes of root coverage procedures.

Materials And Methods: In this single-blinded, randomized prospective clinical trial, patients presenting with multiple gingival recessions were allocated into three groups based on the timing of suture removal post-surgery: 1 week (TSR1), 2 weeks (TSR2), and 3 weeks (TSR3). Primary outcomes measured included Percentage of Root Coverage (%RC) and Complete Root Coverage (CRC), among other clinical outcomes. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: At 6 months, the %RC was 58.4% (TSR1), 91.5% (TSR2), and 75.7% (TSR3). TSR2 achieved a 28.9% higher %RC than TSR1, while no significant differences were found between TSR2 and TSR3. CRC was 38.2% (TSR1), 78.6% (TSR2), and 62.5% (TSR3). TSR2 resulted in a 5.92-fold increase in CRC compared to TSR1, whereas no significant difference was observed between TSR2 and TSR3.

Conclusions: This suggests that a 2-week period before suture removal may optimize root coverage outcomes. However, extending suture removal timing beyond 2 weeks did not confer additional benefits.These findings are specific to the use of polypropylene and the CAF plus connective tissue graft. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier [NCT04826653]).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.7525DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

suture removal
20
root coverage
20
removal timing
12
clinical trial
8
clinical outcomes
8
tsr3 tsr2
8
tsr2
7
suture
5
root
5
coverage
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!