Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This article examines use of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) expanded access pathway to permit cardiac xenotransplants. This article first argues that, although data are collected from cardiac xenotransplant surgeries authorized through the FDA's expanded access pathway, uses of preclinical trial data do not align with the FDA's stated aims of expanded access. This article also argues that potential risks of xenotransplantation merit greater caution than risks posed by devices and that it is unclear how caution about such risks is regarded and operationalized during the FDA's expanded access authorization processes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.197 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!