Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of distance between dental abutments on the accuracy of one-step and two-step impression techniques with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) material.
Materials And Methods: Four master models were fabricated with different interabutment distances equal to one, two, three, and four premolar lengths 1-4 (L1, L2, L3, and L4). Seven one-step impressions were taken from each master model using PVS impression material (Group A, n = 7). For two-step impressions, a 1.5 mm polyethylene spacer was used over each master model, and impressions were taken (Group B, n = 7). Scans from the casts were superimposed over the master model scans. Accordingly, differences were measured and compared with statistical tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test, Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman's test) to evaluate the effect of interabutment distance within each impression technique group and also compare the one-step and two-step impression techniques. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A statistically significant difference was noted among the different edentulous areas in the one-step impression technique group (Group A, p = 0.010). At edentulous span, a statistically significant difference was recorded (p = 0.047) with two-step impression technique being more accurate compared to the one-step impression technique. Friedman's pairwise analysis in Group A demonstrated a significance between one premolar and four premolar interabutment distance groups (p = 0.006).
Conclusion: The accuracy of the one-step impression is significantly affected by the increase in interabutment distance from one premolar to four premolar edentulous.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872798 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70100 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!