Am J Emerg Med
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Published: February 2025
Objective: Posterior circulation stroke can mimic benign causes of vertigo, presenting with no obvious neurologic signs. Differentiating central from peripheral causes remains a challenge. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of three bedside screening tools for cerebrovascular causes of vertigo: HINTS examination, ABCD2 score, and TriAGe+ score.
Method: We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study. Our primary outcome was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the HINTS exam, ABCD2 score, and TriAGe+ score for predicting stroke in patients presenting with isolated dizziness or vertigo. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the best cut-off scores.
Results: 357 patients were recruited, of which 58 were diagnosed with stroke. The sensitivity and specificity of the HINTS exam were 100% and 85.9%, respectively. At a cut-off ≥ 10 for the TriAGe+ score, a sensitivity of 46.6% and a specificity of 96.3% was found. The sensitivity and specificity of the ABCD2 score (≥4) were 65.5% and 68.6%. AUC values for HINTS, ABCD2, and TriAGe+ scores were 0.88, 0.71, and 0.88, respectively. The TriAGe+ score and HINTS exam showed the same diagnostic performance. The exclusion power of the HINTS exam was higher due to the negative LR of 0.0, whereas the diagnostic power of the TriAGe+ score was higher due to the positive LR of 12.65.
Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the HINTS exam and the TriAGE+ score was better than the ABCD2 score. In our cohort, the HINTS exam was highly sensitive, whereas the specificity of the TriAGe+ score was better than other tests. Clinical experience and training are essential for a reliable HINTS exam, whereas the TriAGe+ score, with its practical structure, could help clinicians identify stroke in the chaotic ED environment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.027 | DOI Listing |
Am J Emerg Med
February 2025
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objective: Posterior circulation stroke can mimic benign causes of vertigo, presenting with no obvious neurologic signs. Differentiating central from peripheral causes remains a challenge. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of three bedside screening tools for cerebrovascular causes of vertigo: HINTS examination, ABCD2 score, and TriAGe+ score.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
February 2025
College of Information and Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
Background: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, such as GPT-3.5 Turbo (OpenAI) and GPT-4, have demonstrated significant potential by achieving good scores on text-only United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) exams and effectively answering questions from physicians. However, the ability of these models to interpret medical images remains underexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWest J Emerg Med
January 2025
Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York.
Introduction: The utility of the three-part bedside oculomotor exam HINTS (head impulse test, nystagmus, test of skew) in the hands of emergency physicians remains under debate despite being supported by the most recent literature. Educators historically lack consensus on how specifically to teach this skill to emergency medicine (EM) residents, and it is unknown whether and how EM residency programs have begun to implement HINTS training into their curricula. We aimed to characterize the state of HINTS education in EM residency and develop a needs assessment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Res Arch
April 2024
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Background: In recent years, cervical cancer screening among Black women in the United States has declined, followed by increased incidence and mortality. We aim to evaluate the individual, sociocultural, and structural barriers to cervical cancer screening in relationship to the exam technique barriers.
Methods: Participants received cervical cancer self-screening kits in the mail.
J Med Internet Res
May 2024
Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Background: Telemedicine expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, though use differed by age, sex, race or ethnicity, educational attainment, income, and location. It is unclear if high telehealth use or inequities persisted late into the pandemic.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of, inequities in, and primary reasons for telehealth visits a year after telemedicine expansion.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!
© LitMetric 2025. All rights reserved.