A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Technological innovations review in reducing formaldehyde emissions through adhesives and formaldehyde scavengers for building materials. | LitMetric

The issue of formaldehyde pollution in indoor building materials was receiving increasing attention from scholars. With the increasing number of research cases on building materials, a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of existing representative technologies was crucial for the future development of building materials. Adhesives and formaldehyde scavengers were common additive materials in building materials. The effects brought by the technological innovation of these two technologies were more cost-effective and feasible compared to the updating of building materials themselves. This article reviewed the research progress of adhesive and formaldehyde scavenger technologies for three types of building materials (wood-based materials, coatings, and insulation materials) since 2000, totaling 300 articles. It outlined the key technological advancements of each development stage and included a meta-analysis of 80 selected studies to evaluate the effectiveness of these technologies in reducing formaldehyde emissions. The meta-analysis results indicated that, among all studied adhesives, natural plant-based and bio-based adhesives were the most effective in reducing formaldehyde emissions, achieving an overall reduction rate of 91%-94%. For formaldehyde scavengers, nanomaterials, particularly graphene and titanium dioxide, performed the highest effectiveness in reducing formaldehyde emissions, with an overall reduction rate of 97%-98%. The issue of light supply was the main bottleneck for the technological breakthroughs. The combination of degradation materials and adsorption materials for formaldehyde scavengers was currently a research hotspot, and the combination of adhesives and scavengers was also a future research direction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

building materials
28
reducing formaldehyde
16
formaldehyde emissions
16
formaldehyde scavengers
16
materials
12
formaldehyde
10
adhesives formaldehyde
8
reduction rate
8
building
7
adhesives
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!