Objectives: The treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) represents a challenge in tailoring appropriate medication for individual patients. The augmentation of pregabalin to conventional treatment has shown promising outcomes in relieving pain and improving the quality of life in chronic pain conditions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vortioxetine with other antidepressants (SSRIs/SNRIs) in combination with pregabalin in a cohort of unresponsive BMS patients and to predict treatment response by using clinical data.

Methods: A 52-week randomized, open-label, comparative clinical study was conducted, enrolling 203 BMS patients previously treated with one antidepressant for 12 weeks and non-responders to the treatment (clinical trial registration: NCT06025474). The study sample included two groups: Group A (136) received vortioxetine, while Group B (67) received SSRIs/SNRIs. Pregabalin (75 mg/day) was added to both groups, with a potential dosage increase to 150 mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks. Treatment response was assessed with VAS and SF-MPQ, HAM-A, and HAM-D scores at 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to predict treatment response.

Results: A total of 84 (61.8%) BMS patients in Group A and 39 (58.2%) in Group B showed treatment response. Group A reported a faster onset of action compared to Group B (44.8% versus 22.4% at time 1; p:0.002**) and lower adverse event rates (8.8% versus 20.8%; p:0.001).

Conclusion: The addition of pregabalin to vortioxetine may be considered a potential treatment option for BMS. Further research is required to corroborate these findings and optimize personalized treatment approaches for BMS patients.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06025474).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X22999240729103717DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bms patients
12
treatment response
12
treatment
9
burning mouth
8
mouth syndrome
8
clinical trial
8
predict treatment
8
trial registration
8
bms
6
group
6

Similar Publications

Background: Although systemic therapies have improved considerably over the last decade, up to 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma still die due to disease progression. Oncological treatment at the end-of-life phase is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and type of systemic therapy received by melanoma patients in their end-of-life phase.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), an immunotherapy used in cancer treatment, are associated with potential cardiovascular (CV) toxicity. Monitoring CV issues in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is challenging due to their lower incidence and diversity. Hence, enhancing our understanding of CV toxicities in patients receiving ICIs is required to improve their quality of life and survival.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Isolated extramedullary manifestations (IEM) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are recurrent events, especially following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). To date, measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment for this difficult-to-treat patient cohort has not been established. In this study, we evaluated highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of IEM-AML tumor and compared it with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma, as well as highly sensitive NGS analysis of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), in a cohort of 15 IEM-AML patients with 19 IEM-AML episodes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dementia is a group of chronic diseases characterised by cognitive impairment that progressively disrupts daily functioning and requires increasing levels of healthcare, social support, and long-term care. Support for people with dementia can be provided by formal support systems although most of the care process relies upon informal care givers. Despite the availability of formal support systems and healthcare workers, the utilization of dementia care services remains suboptimal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors provide limited depth and durability of response in myelofibrosis. We evaluated pelabresib-a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor-plus ruxolitinib (a JAK inhibitor) compared with placebo plus ruxolitinib as first-line therapy. In this phase 3 study (MANIFEST-2), JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis were randomized 1:1 to pelabresib 125 mg once daily (QD; 50-175 mg QD permitted) for 14 days followed by a 7-day break (21-day cycle), or to placebo in combination with ruxolitinib 10 or 15 mg twice daily (BID; 5 mg QD-25 mg BID permitted).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!