Background: Clinical studies often aim to test the non-inferiority of a treatment compared to an alternative intervention with binary matched-pairs data. These studies are often planned with methods for completely observed pairs only. However, if missingness is more frequent than expected or is anticipated in the planning phase, methods are needed that allow the inclusion of partially observed pairs to improve statistical power.
Methods: We propose a flexible generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach to estimate confidence intervals for the risk difference, which accommodates partially observed pairs. Using simulated data, we compare this approach to alternative methods for completely observed pairs only and to those that also include pairs with missing observations. Additionally, we reconsider the study sample size calculation by applying these methods to a study with binary matched-pairs setting.
Results: In moderate to large sample sizes, the proposed GEE approach performs similarly to alternative methods for completely observed pairs only. It even results in a higher power and narrower interval widths in scenarios with missing data and where missingness follows a missing (completely) at random (MCAR / MAR) mechanism. The GEE approach is also non-inferior to alternative methods, such as multiple imputation or confidence intervals explicitly developed for missing data settings. Reconsidering the sample size calculation for an observational study, our proposed approach leads to a considerably smaller sample size than the alternative methods.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that the proposed GEE approach is a powerful alternative to existing methods and can be used for testing non-inferiority, even if the initial sample size calculation was based on a different statistical method. Furthermore, it increases the analytical flexibility by allowing the inclusion of additional covariates, in contrast to other methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866877 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02497-2 | DOI Listing |
Accid Anal Prev
March 2025
Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Intelligent Traffic Control Technology, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China. Electronic address:
Work zones present unique risks to both workers and road users due to its complex and dynamic nature. This study developed a two-stage in-vehicle warning system aimed at refining driver behavior when approaching work zones and mitigating lane-changing risks. To accurately capture the thorough behavioral processes of drivers near work zones, a driving simulation experiment was conducted involving 38 participants of diverse genders and occupations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCommun Psychol
March 2025
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Parsing heterogeneity in the nature of adversity exposure and neurobiological functioning may facilitate better understanding of how adversity shapes individual variation in risk for and resilience against anxiety. One putative mechanism linking adversity exposure with anxiety is disrupted threat and safety learning. Here, we applied a person-centered approach (latent profile analysis) to characterize patterns of adversity exposure at specific developmental stages and threat/safety discrimination in corticolimbic circuitry in 120 young adults.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFbioRxiv
February 2025
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) provides unprecedented insights into gene expression patterns while retaining spatial context, making it a valuable tool for understanding complex tissue architectures, such as those found in cancers. Seurat, by far the most popular tool for analyzing ST data, uses the Wilcoxon rank-sum test by default for differential expression analysis. However, as a nonparametric method that disregards spatial correlations, the Wilcoxon test can lead to inflated false positive rates and misleading findings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Res Methodol
February 2025
Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Background: Clinical studies often aim to test the non-inferiority of a treatment compared to an alternative intervention with binary matched-pairs data. These studies are often planned with methods for completely observed pairs only. However, if missingness is more frequent than expected or is anticipated in the planning phase, methods are needed that allow the inclusion of partially observed pairs to improve statistical power.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Public Health
February 2025
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Background: Morbidity is an immediate predictor of malnutrition. However, nutritional interventions to reduce frequent morbidities in adolescents were not conducted well based on behavioral models in low-income countries like Ethiopia. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of selected double-duty interventions on frequency of morbidities among adolescents based on health belief model in Debre Berhan Regiopolitan City, Central Ethiopia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!