A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simultaneous biphasic enantioselective liquid-liquid extraction for racemic separation pantoprazole. | LitMetric

Obtaining optically-pure enantiopure in a cost-efficient and eco-friendly manner is of high importance to human health and environmental sustainability. Currently, enantioselective liquid-liquid extraction (ELLE) is one of the promising processes because of its green production and advantages in scaling up. Nonetheless, the ELLE method for enantioseparation is still unsatisfactory due to the poor efficiency. Herein we present, using pantoprazole (PAN) as a case study, simultaneously employing chiral ionic liquids (CILs) and tartaric acids (TA) derivatives as hydrophilic and hydrophobic chiral additives in biphasic recognition chiral extraction (BRCE) process to enhance the performance. (92) RESULTS: The types of CILs and TA derivatives configurations, concentration of chiral additives and initial PAN, extraction temperature, aqueous pH value have been systematically investigated. The excellent enantioselectivity (α) and enantiomeric excess (e.e.%) values of 3.83 and 13.3 % were achieved at the pH of 8.0, temperature of 25 °C, the initial PAN concentration of 0.3 mg/mL, and the ratio of 1:10 of [Bmim][L-Phe] to [D-di-isopropyl-tartrate], which is significantly better than other available ELLE systems in previous works. Furthermore, the equilibrium and mechanism of stereoselective capacity in BRCE was discussed. And isolated interaction between hydrophobic and hydrophilic chiral additives toward PAN enantiomer was simulated by DFT calculations. As a result, comprehensive efficiency for BRCE was improved greatly while comparing with monophasic recognition chiral extraction (MRCE). Theoretically, in terms of enantioselective capacity, BRCE technology was stronger than MRCE. (135) SIGNIFICANCE: We propose that the improvement of performance was attributed to the simultaneous biphasic recognition of oppositely R- and S-enantiomers. This work provides guidance for construction of an enhanced BRCE system in combination with multistage countercurrent cascade technology a fierce rival in the field of new enantioselective separation technologies. In addition, it is also foreseeable that different stereochemical preferences under thermodynamic and kinetic conditions may be exploited to increase by consecutive BRCE technology. (72).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2025.343730DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chiral additives
12
simultaneous biphasic
8
enantioselective liquid-liquid
8
liquid-liquid extraction
8
biphasic recognition
8
recognition chiral
8
chiral extraction
8
initial pan
8
capacity brce
8
brce technology
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!