A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Versus Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Tremor Patients: A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Comparison. | LitMetric

Background: Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) and unilateral magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), with potential future second-side treatment targeting the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), are currently the two best-established interventions for pharmaco-resistant tremors, but treatment selection is hampered by the lack of comparative evidence.

Objective: To provide the first direct within-center and within-surgeon comparison between bilateral VIM-DBS and unilateral VIM-MRgFUS, applying consistently timed and elaborated efficacy and safety assessements.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients having received bilateral VIM-DBS (n = 30) or unilateral VIM-MRgFUS (n = 52) performed by one single neurosurgeon between 2014 and 2022. Efficacy was primarily measured by the improvement of the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor scale in the more affected hand at 6 months. Regarding safety, we compared treatment-, procedure-, and hardware-related adverse events (AEs), graded by impact on activities of daily living (ADLs), and serious AEs (SAEs), retrospectively defined based on prolonged/repeated hospitalizations or persistent symptoms affecting ADLs.

Results: We found equivalent tremor reduction in the more affected hand (DBS: 62.4% [41.3-87.9] vs. MRgFUS: 69.4% [42.4-77.7]; P = 0.958), but contralateral and axial tremors improved only with bilateral DBS. DBS was associated with a higher rate of procedure- and hardware-related AEs (17% vs. 2%; P = 0.023) but a nonsignificantly lower rate of persistent treatment-related AEs affecting ADLs at 6 months (7% vs. 13%; P = 0.343). Overall, the rates of SAEs (23.3% vs. 19.2%; P = 0.779) and persistent deficits affecting ADLs at 6 months (10% vs. 13%; P = 0.82) were similar.

Conclusions: Despite distinct safety profiles, both interventions produced a similar burden of AEs. Tremor control was equivalent on the more affected side, whereas contralateral and axial tremors improved only after bilateral DBS. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.30153DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep brain
8
brain stimulation
8
magnetic resonance-guided
8
resonance-guided focused
8
focused ultrasound
8
bilateral vim-dbs
8
unilateral vim-mrgfus
8
procedure- hardware-related
8
contralateral axial
8
axial tremors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!