Introduction: This study investigates the preferences of cataract patients in East China regarding intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted using a questionnaire that included various IOLs attributes. Participants made choices based on different combinations of these attributes, and the data were analyzed using multinomial logit models (MNL) and latent class analysis (LCA) to identify preference heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 200 cataract patients (mean age 66.2 years, 58.5% female) participated in the study. The most influential factors in IOL selection were cost, followed by presbyopia correction, with a preference for multifocal IOLs (trifocal and bifocal), spherical aberration correction, and astigmatism correction. High cost and a higher probability of adverse visual phenomena negatively affected preferences. The inclusion of blue-blocking functionality and the surgeon's recommendation had minimal influence on patient choice. LCA revealed three distinct preference groups: Class 1 ("Aberration Correction Seekers") preferred aspheric IOLs, Class 2 ("Presbyopia and Blue-Blocking Enthusiasts") favored multifocal IOLs, and Class 3 ("Astigmatism and Cost-Sensitive Patients") preferred toric IOLs. Multinomial logistic regression analysis further showed that male patients were more likely to choose toric IOLs, while individuals with higher education levels were significantly less likely to prefer multifocal IOLs.

Conclusion: This study highlights significant heterogeneity in cataract patient preferences for IOLs attributes. Cost was the most critical factor, followed by presbyopia and aberration correction. Men favored toric IOLs and exhibited sensitivity to cost, while highly educated individuals preferred multifocal IOLs less. These findings underscore the need for personalized IOLs recommendations and signal opportunities for innovation and customization in the IOLs industry.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861010PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1446715DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multifocal iols
12
toric iols
12
iols
11
patient preferences
8
intraocular lenses
8
discrete choice
8
choice experiment
8
cataract patients
8
iols attributes
8
aberration correction
8

Similar Publications

Background: To evaluate refractive, visual, and patient-reported outcomes three months after bilateral implantation of a novel bi-aspheric, non-diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) using PhaseRing technology to achieve good vision across distances with reduced dysphotopsia.

Methods: Twenty-two patients received bilateral Asqelio EDOF IOLs (AST VisionCare Inc.) and were evaluated 3 months post-surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To compare the visual effect and subjective satisfaction of cataract patients with different refractive states after trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods: This retrospective study describes 134 eyes of 86 patients that were implanted with trifocal IOL (TFNT00). Patients were allocated into three groups according to their preoperative axial length (AL): A group (AL ≤ 24 mm), B group (24 mm < AL < 26 mm), and C group (AL ≥ 26 mm).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate how varying levels of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) affect visual quality in patients with trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: Twenty-nine patients implanted with trifocal IOLs were assessed for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), defocus curves, the contrast sensitivity function, and the area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). The measurements were performed under natural viewing conditions after introducing +1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clinically and quantitatively evaluate the speed of brain adaptation following multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The speed of brain adaptation is considered to vary among individuals and influence postoperative visual recovery.

Methods: At our institution, a total of 24 cases underwent cataract surgery with the implantation of FineVision PodF (BVI/PhysIOL), PanOptix (Alcon), Intensity (Hanita Lenses), Tecnis Synergy (J&J), and Vivity (Alcon).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes of simple high myopia (HM) and mild pathologic myopia (PM) following implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and investigate the influence of fundus structures.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 63 high myopic eyes of 63 patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) between July 2020 and September 2024. 34 eyes in the HM group and 29 eyes in the PM group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!