Giant paraesophageal hernias (GPEH) present challenges in management and surgical technique. Laparoscopic repair has been the gold standard for GPEH repair. Despite technical advances in laparoscopy, complications and recurrence remain high. The da Vinci Surgical System has emerged as a way to improve upon the gold standard. The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients who underwent robotic GPEH repair in comparison to the clinical data in the literature on laparoscopic GPEH repair. We retrospectively reviewed patient records who underwent GPEH repair between November 2012 and February 2023 at a single high-volume tertiary care center. Perioperative data and patient outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Ninety-two patients underwent robotic GPEH repair. Sixty-seven had Type III hernias (72.8%) and twenty-five had Type IV hernias (27.2%). Four (4.3%) required conversion to open repair and two (2.2%) required reoperation for recurrence. Twelve (13.0%) experienced complications including one surgical complication (splenic laceration) and eleven medical complications (fever, ileus, pleural effusion, and heart failure exacerbation). There was no perioperative mortality. Mean operative time was 166.4 ± 29.5 min, and hospital stay was 5.8 ± 3.1 days. Obesity (BMI > 30) was associated with higher complication and recurrence rates. Robotic GPEH repair demonstrates promising outcomes, with lower recurrence rates and fewer postoperative complications compared to published data on laparoscopic repair. While a randomized control trial is needed to substantiate these results, our data support that a robotic approach could become the standard of care for GPEH repair.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02247-y | DOI Listing |
J Robot Surg
February 2025
Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Giant paraesophageal hernias (GPEH) present challenges in management and surgical technique. Laparoscopic repair has been the gold standard for GPEH repair. Despite technical advances in laparoscopy, complications and recurrence remain high.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHernia
December 2023
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Purpose: Giant paraesophageal hernia (GPEH) is a challenging problem for surgeons because of its high recurrence rate. This study was conducted to compare the outcomes in type IV vs. type III GPEHs after laparoscopic repair.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
June 2022
Division of GI, Trauma, and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Introduction: Data is limited on hybrid transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and hiatal hernia repair in giant paraoesophageal hernia (GPEH). We aimed to assess the safety, patient satisfaction, and symptom resolution following a hybrid paraoesophageal hernia (PEH) repair and TIF in patients with GPEH.
Patients And Methods: All single-session hybrid TIF combined with minimally invasive PEH repair performed between February 2020 and June 2021 were evaluated.
JTCVS Tech
September 2020
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
BMC Surg
May 2020
Department of General Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Background: Computed tomography (CT) is widely used in the diagnosis of giant paraesophageal hernias (GPEH) but has not been utilised systematically for follow-up. We performed a cross-sectional observational study to assess mid-term outcomes of elective laparoscopic GPEH repair. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the radiological hernia recurrence rate by CT and to determine its association with current symptoms and quality of life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!