Introduction: For adolescents with brain injury, challenges with social function often persist into adulthood, impacting social participation and quality of life. The Programme for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS) is a manualised group-based intervention with preliminary evidence demonstrating improved social knowledge and participation for adolescents with acquired brain injury or cerebral palsy when delivered face to face. The recent COVID-19 pandemic and challenges for families living outside metropolitan centres to access the programme suggest a telehealth delivered PEERS should be explored. This study aims to compare telehealth PEERS to usual care in a mixed-methods randomised waitlist-controlled trial to determine preliminary efficacy to improve social functioning and secondarily to determine acceptability, feasibility, cost and contextual factors impacting the implementation.

Methods And Analysis: In this single-centre mixed-methods randomised waitlist-controlled trial, 32 adolescents with brain injury, aged 11-17 years attending mainstream high school and their caregivers will be randomised to receive either (a) telehealth PEERS once/week for 1.5 hours for 14 weeks or (b) usual care (UC). UC is highly variable in Australia but often comprises fortnightly occupational therapy, physiotherapy or speech therapy. The waitlist group will then receive PEERS following the 26-week retention time point. Measures will be administered at baseline, 14 weeks (immediately post) and then 26 and 52 weeks post baseline. The primary outcome is self-reported performance and satisfaction with social goals on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes include self and parent-reported social competence, frequency of get-togethers with peers, self-report knowledge of social skills, frequency of peer victimisation and quality of life. An implementation evaluation will be done to determine acceptability, feasibility, cost and identify barriers and facilitators in the implementation of the intervention and map these against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. This study will assess the unit costs of implementing the PEERS from an Australian health system perspective.

Ethics And Dissemination: The Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service and The University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committees have approved this study. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

Trial Registration Number: ACTRN1263000082606.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865754PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081843DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mixed-methods randomised
12
brain injury
12
programme education
8
education enrichment
8
enrichment relational
8
relational skills
8
peers
8
skills peers
8
adolescents acquired
8
adolescents brain
8

Similar Publications

Background: In people living with polycystic kidney disease (PKD), physical inactivity may contribute to poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To date, no research has elucidated the impact of a PKD-specific physical activity programme on HRQoL and physical health. This substudy of the Kidney BEAM Trial evaluated the impact of a PKD-specific 12-week educational and physical activity digital health intervention for people living with PKD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the feasibility and clinical utility of the Diego™ for people with a cervical spinal cord injury (CSI) in an acute spinal ward.

Materials And Methods: A mixed methods study included prospective measurement of outcomes and qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals. A 22 day (4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Healthcare workers' well-being is of utmost importance given persistent high rates of burnout, which also affects quality of care. Minority healthcare workers (MHCW) face unique challenges including structural racism and discrimination. There is limited data on interventions addressing the psychological well-being of MHCW.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To characterize clinical value set issues and identify common patterns of errors.

Materials And Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 value set experts and performed root cause analyses of errors identified in electronic health records (EHRs). We also analyzed a random sample of user-reported issues from the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC), developing a categorization scheme for value set errors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implementation of antepartum preterm birth interventions: A scoping review.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X

March 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California in San Francisco, San Franscisco, CA, United States.

While antenatal recommendations regarding preterm birth are essential to preventing neonatal morbidity and mortality, implementation of these recommendations underscore how health system capacity and systemic factors, such as access and quality, greatly influence their utilization. To date, there is limited synthesis focused on the implementation of antenatal preterm birth interventions. Our objectives were to focus on implementation science studies intended to 1) increase referral mechanisms of pregnant people to higher levels of care where the management of preterm labor or delivery is possible and 2) map the implementation of preterm birth interventions, including the administration of antenatal corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and antibiotics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!