Figurative language is a complex construct related to intelligence. Psychology and psycholinguistics are trying to understand it from an interdisciplinary perspective, but studies are still scarce, methodologies are heterogeneous, and results are difficult to integrate. Some studies suggest that understanding the cognitive processes underlying figurative language and its forms could provide a new approach to understanding intellectual differences, such as high intellectual ability (HIA), and new instruments to assess it. The language of HIA children develops earlier and includes the use of irony, which involves metalinguistic skills. In this context, the present study aims to offer an instrument, called the verbal irony questionnaire (or VIrQ), to test the comprehension of verbal irony in students with HIA. A convenience sample of = 169 students with HIA, aged between 7 and 15 years, responded to the VIrQ. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. The results revealed that 33 items were retained and categorized into four factors. F1, ironic dissociation (14 items); F2, ironic attitude (8 items); F3, ironic constructions (7 items); and F4, reinforced irony echo (4 items). All factors have adequate reliability indices above 0.70 and below 0.95. Finally, new perspectives are also discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856102PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

verbal irony
16
irony questionnaire
8
high intellectual
8
intellectual ability
8
figurative language
8
students hia
8
items ironic
8
irony
5
items
5
verbal
4

Similar Publications

[Verbal irony and high intellectual capacity: comparative approach (7-9 years)].

Medicina (B Aires)

March 2025

Departamento de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de La Rioja, Logroño, España.

Introduction: The neurobiological potentiality of cognitive resources in High Intellectual Ability (HIA) involves complex cognition and representation of the world. This is related to language and figurative language. Competence in figurative language and its forms, such as verbal irony, is an understudied aspect of High Intellectual Ability that could provide a broader understanding of the abilities that constitute it, compared to the development of typical intelligence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Figurative language is a complex construct related to intelligence. Psychology and psycholinguistics are trying to understand it from an interdisciplinary perspective, but studies are still scarce, methodologies are heterogeneous, and results are difficult to integrate. Some studies suggest that understanding the cognitive processes underlying figurative language and its forms could provide a new approach to understanding intellectual differences, such as high intellectual ability (HIA), and new instruments to assess it.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Can irony regulate negative emotion? Evidence from behaviour and ERPs.

Cogn Emot

April 2024

Department of Psychology & Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • This study looked at how verbal irony (saying something that means the opposite) and cognitive reappraisal (changing the way we think about things to feel better) help people feel less sad.
  • Participants saw sad pictures and then read either ironic or regular statements about them, and they used either cognitive reappraisal or just looked at the pictures to manage their feelings.
  • The results showed that using irony and cognitive reappraisal both helped reduce negative feelings, but cognitive reappraisal was even more effective than irony.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Humor is essential to social relationships. Its use and understanding appear to be impaired in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The main objective was to review the existing literature on the detection, understanding and use of humor in persons with ASD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The present study investigated the relationship between satirical discourse processing and a theoretical model of satire comprehension known as satirical uptake. Word reading times and participant perceptions of sincerity for a set of minimally different satirical and nonsatirical texts were modelled considering individual differences such as need for cognition (NFC) and genre familiarity. Across two experiments, participants read either a mixture of satirical and nonsatirical texts (Experiment 1) or only satirical/nonsatirical texts (Experiment 2), indicating the degree to which they felt the meaning of the text was sincere.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!