Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons on patients' selection.

Methods: An Expert Panel Meeting of medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons was held virtually by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) to discuss results of pivotal clinical trials with perioperative chemo-immunotherapy and reach agreement on open issues for the topic, formulating specific statements based on initially proposed discussion questions.

Results: Overall, panelists found agreement on seven statements. With regard to tissue and biomarker analysis, the role of increasing PD-L1 expression in predicting IO efficacy was recognized, whereas ctDNA and pCR were mainly attributed a prognostic role, in the absence of dedicated studies. The panelists acknowledged direct relationship between the benefit of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy approaches and the local burden of disease/mediastinal node involvement, supporting the inclusion of these factors, together with PD-L1, in selecting upfront surgery or induction treatment. The panelists agreed that the current literature data do not answer the issue of assessing the role of the adjuvant phase within a perioperative treatment strategy. Surgical considerations on the role of pneumonectomy and other approaches were also discussed.

Conclusions: This experience highlights the importance of a synergistic approach between oncologists and surgeons to leverage the unmet needs in translating results of IO-perioperative clinical trials into clinical practice in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854886PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perioperative chemo-immunotherapy
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
cancer nsclc
8
expert panel
8
panel meeting
8
clinical practice
8
medical oncologists
8
oncologists thoracic
8

Similar Publications

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 20% of patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with stage IIIA-IIIB disease, for which the optimal treatment remains unclear. Meta-analyses reveal that neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI-chemotherapy significantly improves pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), major pathological response (MPR), and R0 rate compared to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons on patients' selection.

Methods: An Expert Panel Meeting of medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons was held virtually by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) to discuss results of pivotal clinical trials with perioperative chemo-immunotherapy and reach agreement on open issues for the topic, formulating specific statements based on initially proposed discussion questions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to explore how the timing of immunotherapy affects survival rates in patients with resectable lung cancer by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
  • A total of 865 studies were screened, resulting in 4425 participants being analyzed; the findings indicated that timing (neoadjuvant, peri-operative, or post-operative) influences survival, with the neoadjuvant group showing the most promising hazard ratio for death.
  • Despite some adverse events being more frequent with neoadjuvant therapy, the overall survival benefits were not significantly established, suggesting further research may be needed to confirm optimal treatment timing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We examined national patterns of care and perioperative outcomes for women after mastectomy, comparing home recovery (HR) with hospital admission.

Patients And Methods: Using Martketscan data (2017-2019), women ≥ 18 years old who underwent mastectomy ± reconstruction were identified and classified as either home recovery (same calendar day discharge) or hospital admission (stays > 1 calendar day). Comorbidities and receipt of chemo/immunotherapy 6 months prior to surgery and post-surgical 30-day complications were measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Since the approval of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in Europe, treatment options for resectable stage II-III NSCLC have also significantly improved in clinical routine. Surgical excision of the tumour by anatomic lung resection still remains the most essential component of multimodal therapy. However, with the increasing use of the new treatment concepts in clinical routine, questions also arise regarding safety, adverse events and technical resectability following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!