Objectives: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) offers an alternative to repeat cardiac surgery in selected patients. However, ViV-TAVI in previously implanted stentless valves is more challenging than in a stented valve. This single-center study aimed to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in stentless valves.
Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 1476 patients undergoing TAVI between January 2018 and December 2023. The primary study endpoint was 30-day and follow-up mortality. Secondary outcomes included Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 technical success, VARC-3 device success, and VARC-3 early safety.
Results: A total of 15 patients underwent ViV-TAVI within previously implanted stentless valves. The mean age of the patients was 78.1 ± 9.3 years, with a median STS-PROM score of 4.30 (3.05, 6.75). The mean time between SAVR and TAVI was 14.7 ± 3.9 years. Eight (53.3%) patients presented with severe aortic regurgitation, while 5 (33.3%) patients had severe aortic stenosis. There were no surgical conversions, but a single case of transcatheter heart valve malposition required the deployment of a second valve. One patient died within 30 days. VARC-3 technical success was achieved in 87.6% (n = 13) of patients, device success in 80% (n = 12), and early safety in 73.3% (n = 11). The median follow-up period was 2.9 (range, 1.3-4.3) years, during which 4 patients died.
Conclusions: Careful patient selection is critical for ViV-TAVI procedures because of the high risk of complications, which is increased with stentless valves in addition to the standard risks associated with the ViV procedure. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.25270/jic/25.00006 | DOI Listing |
J Invasive Cardiol
February 2025
Department of Cardiac Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Lankenau Heart Institute, Main Line Health.
Objectives: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) offers an alternative to repeat cardiac surgery in selected patients. However, ViV-TAVI in previously implanted stentless valves is more challenging than in a stented valve. This single-center study aimed to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in stentless valves.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Thorac Surg
September 2024
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.
Background: A straightforward Bentall operation can be performed safely with low mortality, but some challenging cases require a more complex operation. We discuss here the steps of the Bentall procedure.
Methods: We reviewed specific scenarios, such as acute aortic dissection, native valve or prosthetic valve endocarditis, redo Bentall after aortic root replacement, calcified aortic root, and patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting, mechanical aortic valve replacement, stentless aortic valve replacement, and prior extensive aortic arch repair with proximalization of neck vessels.
JACC Case Rep
August 2024
Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
BMJ Open
August 2024
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Introduction: Avoiding patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients with small aortic annulus (SAA) during aortic valve replacement (AVR) is still a challenging surgical problem. Among surgical options available, aortic root enlargement (ARE) and stentless valve implantation (SVI) are the two most commonly used strategies. This systematic review will be conducted searching for superiority evidence based on comparative studies between these two options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!