Background: Whereas traditional image guidance for placement of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) has been fluoroscopy, it has disadvantages including inability to identify soft tissue, radiation exposure, and contrast administration need. Several studies found that ultrasonography is reliable in localizing lumbar nerve root. Few have investigated the feasibility of performing ultrasound guided TFESI in the lumbar spine. This study seeks to aid in filling this gap.
Methods: Patients meeting inclusion criteria (BMI < 25) and exclusion criteria (no spinal deformity or previous lumbar surgery) were enrolled. Ultrasound visualization of nerve root and proximate placement of needle tip guided needle placement. Vascular signals were monitored. The contrast injection was done under real-time ultrasound visualization. Final needle placement with transforaminal epidural spread was assessed for accuracy by contrast fluoroscopy. Complications were assessed.
Results: Thirty ultrasound guided lumbar TFESI were performed. Visualization at the L2, L3, and L4 levels was successful. At the L5 level, needle tip was placed in proximity to the nerve root, but the final needle tip position for transforaminal placement and injection was not visualized; fluoroscopic guidance was used instead. There was no evidence of intravascular injection. No complications were noted.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography shows feasibility as an imaging modality in localizing lumbar intervertebral foramina at higher lumbar levels in patients with normal BMI and no spinal deformities. However, ultrasonography was consistently unable to assist transforaminal needle placement at the L5 level due to poor final needle tip visualization and the requirement of fluoroscopy to advance needle tip transforaminally. While no complications were seen, further controlled trials with larger sample size are needed to investigate safety.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844432 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S499091 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparison of Transforaminal Magnesium Sulfate with Steroid Injection in the Management of Radicular Back Pain: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial Study.
Anesth Pain Med
August 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Background: This study compares the effects of transforaminal magnesium sulfate injection versus other methods for managing radicular back pain, highlighting its potential for improved pain relief and functional outcomes.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial involved 30 patients with radicular back pain who were randomly assigned to receive either transforaminal magnesium sulfate or triamcinolone injection. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and functional disability, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively.
Patient Outcomes Following Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections for Bilateral Lumbar Radicular Symptoms: Correlation of Contrast Spread With Symptom Relief.
Cureus
February 2025
Pain Medicine, Fondazione Paolo Procacci, Rome, ITA.
Introduction Bilateral lumbar radicular symptoms are commonly treated with interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs). The parasagittal approach often results in unilateral contrast spread, which may influence the degree of bilateral symptom relief. This study evaluates whether unilateral contrast spread correlates with symptom improvement in both ipsilateral and contralateral symptoms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFactors associated with improved outcomes after lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections for radicular pain: A systematic review.
N Am Spine Soc J
March 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Purpose: Despite numerous studies, the factors contributing to clinical success after a lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection (LTFESI) for radicular pain remain unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review literature evaluating preprocedural predictive factors for improved outcomes in patients receiving a LTFESI.
Methods: We searched databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for studies published from 2006 through 2023.
Letter to the editor concerning "magnetic resonance imaging ultrasonography fusion-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection: a retrospective cohort" by Ahmet Sumen et al. (Eur spine J [2025]: doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08705-3).
Eur Spine J
March 2025
Mianzhu City People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Clinical and radiographic predictive factors for the favorable outcome of lumbar epidural steroid injection in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective analytical study from Thailand.
Asian Spine J
March 2025
Center of Excellence in Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeleton, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Study Design: A prospective analytic study.
Purpose: To investigate the clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that can predict a favorable outcome following transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Overview Of Literature: The efficacy of lumbar epidural steroid injection varies, and no clinical parameters have been established to predict a favorable response to TFESI reliably.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!