Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.01.015 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Use of Robotic Surgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Biomimetics (Basel)
February 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, VIC 3199, Australia.
Background/objectives: Robotic systems offer enhanced precision, dexterity, and visualization, which are essential in addressing the complex nature of plastic surgery procedures. Despite widespread adoption in other surgical specialties, such as urology and gynecology, their application in plastic surgery remains underexplored. This review examines the use of robotic systems in plastic and reconstructive surgery with a focus on clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRobotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Critical Appraisal.
Clin Breast Cancer
January 2025
The London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Comparative analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional mastectomy for breast cancer.
Eur J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Division of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taipei and Taoyuan City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic mastectomy (RM) and conventional mastectomy (CM) for breast cancer.
Methods: Our institutional registry of women with breast cancer who received RM between 2018 and 2023 and CM between 2016 and 2023 were reviewed. Propensity score matching of clinicopathological variables was used to match 123 RM patients with 123 CM patients.
Robotic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction with Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
The single port robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (SPrNSM) was recently introduced. This approach is safe and has led to favorable outcomes in relation to cosmetic result, patient satisfaction, and breast sensation. The typical reconstruction with all robotic nipple sparing mastectomies is implant based; however, this is not always what a patient desires.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSafety and Feasibility of Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction - Insights From the One of the Largest Centers in Asia.
Clin Breast Cancer
December 2024
Department of General Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shilin, Taipei, Taiwan; Breast Cancer Center, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shilin, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Background: The use of robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) with immediate direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction in treatment of breast cancer has been a controversial topic. The adoption of robotic surgery in breast cancer treatment has gained traction globally due to its minimally invasive nature, potential for improved cosmetic outcomes and better intraoperative visualization. This study provides insights on safety and feasibility robotic mastectomy at one of the largest centers in Asia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!