A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy and safety of GLS4 with entecavir vs entecavir alone in chronic hepatitis B patients: A multicenter clinical trial. | LitMetric

Efficacy and safety of GLS4 with entecavir vs entecavir alone in chronic hepatitis B patients: A multicenter clinical trial.

J Infect

Department of Hepatology, Center of Infectious Diseases and Pathogen Biology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Liver Diseases, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; China-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, Changchun 130021, China. Electronic address:

Published: March 2025

Objectives: GLS4 is a first-in-class hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid assembly modulator that inhibits HBV replication by interfering with assembly and disassembly of the virus nucleocapsid, this prospective, open-label, comparative, phase 2b trial evaluated the antiviral activity and safety of GLS4/ritonavir (RTV) combined with entecavir in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients.

Methods: 250 CHB patients were enrolled, including treatment-naïve patients and those interrupted anti-HBV drugs for ≥ 6 months (Part A, n=125), and patients who had taken ETV for ≥1 year and had achieved viral suppression (Part B, n=125). Patients were randomly allocated to receive 120 mg GLS4/100 mg RTV plus 0.5 mg ETV or 0.5 mg ETV monotherapy for 96 weeks.

Results: In the mid-term, in Part A (n=122), greater least-squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline were observed in the GLS4/RTV plus ETV cohort than in ETV monotherapy cohort in HBV DNA (-6.28 vs -5.72 log10 IU/ml, p=0.0005), HBsAg (-0.87 vs -0.65 log10 IU/ml, p=0.0653), HBV pgRNA (-3.83 vs -1.91 log10 copies/ml, p<0.0001); The proportions of both HBV DNA and pgRNA negative patients were 17.3% (13/75, GLS4/RTV plus ETV) and 0% (0/30, ETV monotherapy). In Part B (n=123), greater mean LSM reductions in HBsAg (-0.17 vs -0.06 log10 IU/ml, p=0.0013), HBV pgRNA (-1.61 vs -0.28 log10 copies/ml, p<0.0001) were also observed in the GLS4/RTV+ETV cohort. the proportions of both HBV DNA and pgRNA-negative patients were 71.6% (48/67, GLS4/RTV plus ETV) and 18.9% (7/37, ETV monotherapy), respectively. No patients achieved HBsAg loss at week 48. GLS4/RTV + ETV were well tolerated, the most common adverse events were elevated alanine aminotransferase levels and hypertriglyceridemia, which were reversed by temporary GLS4/RTV discontinuation.

Conclusions: The primary analysis at week 48 showed that the antiviral efficacy of GLS4/RTV with ETV was clearly superior to that of ETV monotherapy. GLS4/RTV with ETV was well tolerated; further studies evaluating its safety and efficacy are ongoing. (clinical trial identifier: NCT04147208).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106446DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

n=125 patients
8
05 mg etv
8
etv monotherapy
8
log10 iu/ml
8
patients
5
etv
5
efficacy safety
4
safety gls4
4
gls4 entecavir
4
entecavir entecavir
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!