A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Robotic ureteral reconstruction of non-absorbable clip erosion into the ureter: a case series. | LitMetric

Background: Delayed migration of non-absorbable surgical clips into the urinary tract is a rare but potentially morbid complication that may lead to pain, infection, stone formation, and urinary obstruction. The literature on clip erosion into the upper tracts are limited to a handful of case reports of case reports. The purpose of our study was to review outcomes of robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) of non-absorbable clip erosion into the ureter.

Case Description: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent RUR for management of clip erosion into the ureter between September 2022-April 2024 at our tertiary academic center. Indication for surgery was ureteral obstruction. Six patients underwent RUR for clip erosion into the ureter. All patients had non-absorbable clip erosion from a prior urologic surgery. The median length of time between placement of non-absorbable clip and diagnosis of erosion was 90.5 months (IQR, 48.4-219.1). When clip erosion involved ≥80% of the circumference of the ureter, we utilized a transecting technique. As such, two patients underwent ureteral reimplantation with adjunctive maneuvers such as a psoas hitch or Boari flap. When clip erosion involved <80% of the circumference of the ureter, we utilized a non-transecting technique utilizing buccal mucosa graft for four patients. The median operative time was 157 minutes (IQR, 132-318), estimated blood loss was 50 cc (IQR, 31.25-318) and length of stay was 1 day (IQR, 1-1). There were no major (Clavien >2) postoperative complications. At a median follow up of 14.8 months (IQR, 10.1-18.7), all patients achieved surgical success, defined as the absence of obstructive flank pain and ureteral obstruction on functional imaging.

Conclusions: Diagnosis of clip erosion into the ureter is generally delayed. RUR for non-absorbable clip erosion into the ureter is associated with low morbidity and excellent outcomes. When possible, we recommend utilization of interposing a fat flap to minimize the risk of erosion into the upper tracts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833524PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-485DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clip erosion
40
non-absorbable clip
20
erosion ureter
20
erosion
12
patients underwent
12
clip
11
robotic ureteral
8
ureteral reconstruction
8
erosion upper
8
upper tracts
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!