Background: Knowledge on the incidence of surgical complications after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer in nationwide practice is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess complication trends after oesophagectomy in a nationwide, population-based, unselected cohort.

Methods: All patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer in Finland in 1987-2016 were included. All complications defined by the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) were reported in three 10-year periods. Chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare outcomes in these periods.

Results: A total of 1493 patients were included. From 1987 to 1996 to 2007-2016, improvements were seen in the rate of major complications (49% vs. 43%, p = 0.039), length of hospital stay (19 vs. 14 days, median, p < 0.001), length of ICU-stay (3 vs. 2 days, median, p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (17.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001), while pneumonia (16% vs. 23%, p = 0.029) and anastomotic leak (8% vs. 12% in total leaks, p = 0.006 for type II leak) increased. The most common complications were pneumonia, pleural effusion requiring drainage (16% vs. 23%, p = 0.080), atrial dysrhythmia (16% vs. 15%, p = 0.464) and anastomotic leak. The most common complication categories defined by ECCG were pulmonary (36% vs. 42%, p = 0.151) and gastrointestinal (21% vs. 23%, p = 0.398) complications.

Conclusions: This study reports high postoperative morbidity after oesophagectomy in nationwide practice. Mortality has significantly improved during the years, and it appears that patients who would have died earlier, can now be rescued. While the relative occurrence of complications has remained constant, overall morbidity has decreased as the more severe outcomes have decreased.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834619PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03709-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oesophagectomy oesophageal
12
oesophageal cancer
12
surgical complications
8
complications oesophagectomy
8
complications
5
incidence trends
4
trends surgical
4
oesophagectomy
4
cancer population-based
4
population-based nationwide
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Compared to open surgery (OS), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for foregut cancer improves perioperative outcomes. However, the impact of MIS on long-term quality of life (QOL) is unknown. We compare the long-term QOL of patients who underwent MIS and OS for foregut cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The use of epidural analgesia has been proposed to improve the prognosis of esophageal cancer by attenuating the stress response and being less immunosuppressive than opioids. This study aims to evaluate the association, if any, between non-epidural pain management compared to epidural analgesia during minimally invasive or open esophagectomy and esophageal cancer prognosis.

Materials And Methods: This was a population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study in Finland, using the Finnish National Esophago-Gastric Cancer Cohort (FINEGO).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has shown potential benefits over conventional procedures for esophageal cancer. However, uniform surgical protocols are lacking, leading to variability in outcomes and increased costs. This retrospective study included 180 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE between May 2018 and September 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy is widely used for esophageal cancer (EC), but optimal treatment regimens and predictive factors for outcomes remain unclear. This study retrospectively analyzed data from EC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: The or was utilized to examine differences in general clinicopathological data between treatment benefit groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Radiation after esophagectomy may cause conduit dysfunction with unclear oncologic benefits. We hypothesized that adjuvant chemoradiation does not improve survival over chemotherapy alone for patients with pathologic upstaging after primary surgery for cT1-2N0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods: The impact of adjuvant therapy after primary surgery for cT1-2N0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma upstaged to pT3-4 or pN+ in the National Cancer Database (2004-2019) was evaluated with logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox modeling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!