Objective: To assess the use of non-curative interventions and palliative pain management for patients with advanced gynecologic malignancy in the United States.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database. The study population was 2,098,291 patients with stage IV malignancies from 2004 to 2020, including 5 gynecologic malignancies (uterine cervix, uterine corpus, tubo-ovary, vulva, and vagina) and 7 non-gynecologic malignancies (lung, pancreas, colorectum, breast, kidney, liver, and bladder), stratified by gender. Utilization rates and temporal trends of non-curative interventions (systemic therapy, surgery, radiotherapy) and palliative pain management in the first course of intervention were evaluated across the malignancy types.
Results: In 19 gender-stratified malignancy groups, the median rate of non-curative interventions and palliative pain management use rate was 18.3%. All the gynecologic malignancies ranked below the median, including the 3 lowest groups (12.6%, 10.5%, and 7.8% for uterine corpus, vulva, and tubo-ovary, respectively). Non-curative interventions and palliative pain management use increased significantly in non-gynecologic malignancies, whereas utilization remained unchanged over several years for most gynecologic malignancies, including uterine cervix (19.8% to 20.1% for 2012-2020, p-trend = .744), uterine corpus (12.0% to 13.4% for 2013-2020, p-trend = .072), and tubo-ovary (8.3% to 9.2% for 2011-2020, p-trend = .311). Compared with non-gynecologic malignancies, patients with gynecologic malignancy were less likely to receive non-curative systemic therapy by 48% to 80% (all 5 types), non-curative surgery by 15% to 61% (all but vagina), non-curative radiotherapy by 37% to 95% (uterus, tubo-ovary, vulva), and palliative pain management by 18% to 45% (all 5 types) (all, adjusted-p < .05).
Conclusions: In this cohort study, the initial utilization of non-curative interventions and palliative pain management has been unchanged for patients with advanced gynecologic malignancy, and fewer patients receive palliative care than those with non-gynecologic malignancy, including palliative pain management. Possible under-utilization of palliative care services for patients with advanced gynecologic malignancy call for attention and further investigation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101631 | DOI Listing |
Palliat Support Care
March 2025
Departments of Psycho-oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Objectives: Naldemedine is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist used to treat opioid-induced constipation. As this drug does not cross the blood-brain barrier, it is believed that patients without brain metastases do not experience opioid withdrawal symptoms.
Methods: Here, we experienced a case in which a cancer patient without brain metastasis presented with anxiety and restlessness that was severe enough to interfere with daily life.
Cancers (Basel)
March 2025
Medical Department, APICES, Pinto, 28320 Madrid, Spain.
Objective: The aim of the NALOPOOL project was to assess the efficacy and safety of naloxegol in patients with cancer pain who exhibited opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and were treated under real-world conditions.
Methods: We pooled individual patient data from three multicenter observational studies conducted with naloxegol in patients with cancer who exhibited OIC and were prescribed naloxegol under real-world conditions. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated after 4 weeks of treatment.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
March 2025
Last Aid Research Group International (LARGI), Schleswig, Germany.
Global Spine J
March 2025
Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Study DesignNarrative Review.ObjectivesTo summarize the work of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, specifically studies from the Epidemiology, Process and Outcomes in Spine Oncology (EPOSO) study.MethodsA narrative review of all published manuscripts from the EPOSO study was undertaken.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Manag Nurs
March 2025
University Center for Health Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. Electronic address:
Purpose/objectives: Analyze the meaning of pain and suffering experienced by patients with end-stage cancer from a systemic perspective.
Design: Qualitative study based on General Systems Theory.
Sample/participants: Ten patients with terminal stage cancer were interviewed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!