A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ultrasound-guided deep versus superficial continuous serratus anterior plane block for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures: A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. | LitMetric

Background: Efficient analgesia is the cornerstone in multiple rib fractures (MRFs) management. The serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) shows promising outcomes. However, it is still provocative whether the superficial or deep approach is more effective in the SAPB procedure. We hypothesized that the deep approach of ultrasound (US)-guided continuous SAPB could be superior for MRFs pain management.

Methods: Sixty-two adult patients having unilateral MRFs, were randomized into two groups to receive continuous superficial SAPB (group S, n = 31) or continuous deep SAPB (group D, n = 31). As a primary outcome, we compared pain numeric rating scale (NRS), while total analgesic consumption, incentive spirometer volume (IS-V), lung ultrasound score (LUSS), basal and 24-h serum beta-endorphin (BE) levels, and any adverse events were secondary outcomes.

Results: There was a significant reduction in NRS in favor of group D when compared to group S at 30 minutes ( = 0.001) until 12 hours ( = 0.029); total analgesic consumption was significantly lower in group D ( = 0.005). A significant increase in the median IS-V in group D compared to group S at 90 minutes ( = 0.02) and 12h postblock ( = 0.004) LUSS was significantly lower in D group at 90 min, 12 h, and 24 h ( = 0.04, 0.001, 0.031). No significant differences as regards serum BE levels. No adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: Either superficial or deep continuous SAPB can be used safely and effectively in managing pain related to MRFs. Notably, the deep approach offered superior analgesia and improved deep breathing compared to the superficial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829691PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_493_24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep approach
12
serratus anterior
8
anterior plane
8
plane block
8
multiple rib
8
rib fractures
8
superficial deep
8
continuous sapb
8
group
8
sapb group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!