Running biomechanics in people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A cross-sectional analysis of sex differences and relationships with patient reported outcome measures.

Phys Ther Sport

La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia; Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: March 2025

Objectives: (i) Investigate if lower-limb running biomechanics differ between women and men with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and (ii) explore whether sex-specific relationships between lower-limb running biomechanics and symptom severity and sport-related concerns exist.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Gait laboratory.

Participants: Twenty women and 22 men enrolled in a clinical trial of physiotherapist-led treatments for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Main Outcome Measures: Kinematics and kinetics of hip, knee, and ankle joints during the stance phase (calculated from three-dimensional biomechanics data) were compared using statistical parametric mapping. The International Hip Outcome Tool-33 and Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcomes Score quantified hip-related symptom severity and sport-related concerns.

Results: Women had larger hip adduction angles (34%-44% of stance,p = 0.045) than men. For kinetics, women displayed larger external hip extension moments (77%-100%,p = 0.001), smaller knee extension moments (80%-100%,p = 0.007), and smaller ankle dorsiflexion moments (26%-67%,p < 0.001) than men. Worse sport-related concern was associated with a larger peak hip extension angle (0.18, 95%CI 0.05,0.31) and smaller hip flexion moment impulse (0.14∗10, 95% CI 0.02∗10,0.25∗10) in women, and smaller hip external rotation moment impulse in men (0.06∗10, 95% CI 0.01∗10,0.11∗10).

Conclusions: Women and men with FAI syndrome display differences in lower-limb running biomechanics and relationships between symptom severity and running biomechanics are sex-dependent, warranting consideration in future analyses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.02.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

running biomechanics
12
femoroacetabular impingement
12
impingement syndrome
8
outcome measures
8
lower-limb running
8
women men
8
symptom severity
8
severity sport-related
8
extension moments
8
hip
5

Similar Publications

Analysis of midsole gait in running shoes with various 3d printed biomimetic structure.

Sci Rep

March 2025

Department Fashion and Textiles, Dong-A University, Busan, 49315, Republic of Korea.

This study aims to analyze the impact of different 3D printed biomimetic midsole structures on gait phase and gait ratio to optimize running shoe design. Participants wore shoes with various 3D printed midsoles while gait ratio(heel rotation, foot balance, forefoot balance, hallux stiffness, medial forefoot balance, and meta loading) and gait phase(forefoot off phase, foot flat phase, forefoot contact phase, and initial contact phase) data were collected using a gait analysis system. These metrics reflect foot pressure distribution, gait symmetry, and balance, providing insights into how midsole structures affect gait.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biomechanical determinants of running economy.

J Sports Sci

March 2025

Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Running economy (RE) defined as the submaximal rate of oxygen consumption during running, has been correlated with better performance. Biomechanical factors such as spatiotemporal parameters and lower extremity mechanics play a significant role in influencing RE. However, the relationship between RE and biomechanical variables in middle-distance running shoes is still unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a method for assessing gait beyond the confines of a laboratory. Signal noise and calibration errors pose significant obstacles to accurately estimating joint angles, particularly during dynamic activities such as running. Advancements in dynamic optimisation tools could enable a more comprehensive analysis with fewer sensors and/or low-quality data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of OpenCap on lower extremity kinematics during functional tasks.

J Biomech

February 2025

Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; UConn Institute for Sports Medicine, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. Electronic address:

Marker-based motion capture is a fundamental tool in biomechanical analysis, yet comes with major constraints such as time, cost and accessibility. This study aimed to validate the use of OpenCap, a free, markerless motion capture system compared to a marker-based motion capture system to measure lower extremity kinematics during functional tasks. 20 individuals from an athletic population (18 females, 2 males) performed two gait trials (walking, running) and three functional tasks (double leg squat, countermovement jump, jump-landing).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lower body positive pressure treadmills (LBPPT) have gained increasing attention due to their potential applications in sports training, rehabilitation, and biomechanics research. However, there is limited understanding of how differing body weight percentages influence gait and force production. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between force and gait parameters at different body weight percentages on a LBPPT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!