Impact of botulinum toxin type A on ocular pain with neuropathic features.

Ocul Surf

Surgical and Research Services, Miami Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1201 NW 16th St, Miami, FL, 33125, USA; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. Electronic address:

Published: February 2025

Purpose: To investigate the impact of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on neuropathic/nociplastic ocular pain (NOP) and identify predictors of patient outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective study of individuals with NOP symptoms (light sensitivity, wind/air sensitivity, persistent pain despite dry eye treatment) who received ≥1 BoNT-A injection. Primary outcome measures included if (responders vs. non-responders) and to what degree (none vs. mild vs. moderate vs. marked) individuals experienced pain improvement 4-6 weeks post-injection. Demographics and clinical exam information was compared between the groups.

Results: 27 individuals received BoNT-A for NOP symptoms. 74 % (n = 20) reported an improvement in pain and were classified as responders. Among responders, the degree of benefit varied, with 25 % reporting mild, 45 % moderate, and 30 % marked pain improvement. Improvements in light sensitivity (37 %), wind/air sensitivity (33 %), and quality of life (QoL) (59 %) were reported by fewer individuals. 80 % of responders and 0 % of non-responders reported QoL improvements afer BoNT-A. In a multivariable model that examined predictors of response (none to marked, 0-3), the presence of fibromyalgia (FM) (β = 0.50; p = 0.004) portended a better response, while shooting pain (β = -0.47; p = 0.007) portended a worse response to BoNT-A, (full model r = 0.53; p < 0.001). Degree of pain improvement significantly correlated with improvements in light sensitivity, wind/air sensitivity, and QoL (ρ range: 0.42-0.63; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: After BoNT-A, most individuals reported improved ocular pain and QoL, while fewer noted improved light and wind/air sensitivity. Some systemic and ocular factors predicted treatment response and may thus guide treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2025.02.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impact botulinum
8
botulinum toxin
8
toxin type
8
ocular pain
8
nop symptoms
8
light sensitivity
8
wind/air sensitivity
8
pain improvement
8
pain
7
bont-a
5

Similar Publications

An eccentric presentation of transient bilateral mydriasis after botulinum toxin injection: A case report.

Int J Surg Case Rep

March 2025

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Ophthalmology, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Introduction: Botulinum toxin (Botox) can be used to manage strabismus due to its efficacy in inducing muscle paralysis by blocking acetylcholine release. Botox is an important treatment for many conditions in ophthalmology; however, clinicians must be aware of its potential complications, such as mydriasis. Mydriasis is defined as dilation in the pupils, and it can be divided into two subsets: transient and persistent mydriasis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ocular surface side effects of botulinum toxin type A injections in the treatment of lateral canthal wrinkles (Crow's Feet).

Cont Lens Anterior Eye

March 2025

National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China. Electronic address:

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) injections for lateral canthal wrinkles on the ocular surface.

Methods: A total of 30 patients (30 eyes) who received BoNT-A injections were followed over a three-month period. Evaluations included tear meniscus height (TMH), strip meniscometry test, fluorescein tear film break-up time (FTBUT), corneal staining score, meibomian gland orifice and meibum quality score.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections have emerged as a promising alternative for the management of bruxism. In this context, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the impact of BTX-A on patients with bruxism was conducted. A literature search of multiple online electronic databases (PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)) was undertaken from their inception to February 1, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Botulinum neurotoxin is widely regarded as a "wonder medicine" due to its therapeutic efficacy in treating a variety of conditions. While it is traditionally classified as a neurotoxin, it is arguably more appropriate to refer to it as a neuromedicine. All FDA-approved formulations of botulinum neurotoxin are currently administered through intramuscular injections, with no other delivery methods widely used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A surplus of clinical studies focused mainly on the clinical impacts of botulinum neurotoxin type A disregarding the histopathological changes stemming from its injection. This study was designed to inspect the potential effects of botulinum neurotoxin type A injection on the skin and buccal mucosa in both the injected and non-injected sides after one week and one month as no available studies have addressed its histopathological effects.

Methods: Twelve rats were injected with a single injection of 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!