A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Mutations in homologous recombination repair genes in patients with metastatic endometrial cancer: association with clinical characteristics and prognosis. | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate the mutation rates of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and the impact of these mutations on the clinical characteristics of metastatic endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods: Somatic DNA from 895 patients with metastatic EC in the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms cohort was assessed for mutations in 10 HRR genes (, , , , , , , , , and ). The correlation between the mutation status of HRR genes and the clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic EC was evaluated.

Results: Somatic mutations in HRR genes were detected in 106 (11.8%) patients with metastatic EC. Compared with nonmutation carriers, a greater proportion of carriers had endometrioid carcinoma (76.4% vs. 50.3%, p<0.001). Regarding the TCGA classification, the proportions of the -ultramutated (mut) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) subtypes were significantly greater among mutation carriers than noncarriers (20.8% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001; 34.9% vs. 11.9%, p<0.001, respectively). The carriers had a significantly lower frequency of mutations than noncarriers (25.5% vs. 54.1%, p<0.001). Fewer mutation carriers than noncarriers had intra-abdominal and lung metastases (41.5% vs. 54.2%, p=0.014; 19.8% vs. 30.3%, p=0.026, respectively). The mutation status of HRR genes did not significantly affect the overall survival of patients with metastatic EC.

Conclusion: Somatic HRR mutations are detected in 11.8% of metastatic EC. Compared with noncarriers, HRR mutation carriers in metastatic EC have higher proportions of endometrioid carcinoma, mut, and dMMR subtypes, and unique metastatic patterns. However, the prognoses are similar regardless of HRR status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e62DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients metastatic
16
hrr genes
16
clinical characteristics
12
homologous recombination
8
recombination repair
8
metastatic endometrial
8
endometrial cancer
8
mutations hrr
8
genes
5
metastatic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!