Abating a micropollutant epinastine by UV-based advanced oxidation processes: Comparison for UV/hydrogen peroxide, UV/persulfate, and UV/chlorine, impacts of bromide contents, and formation of DBPs during post-chlorination.

Anthropogenic organic compounds, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products, contaminate water, posing toxicological risks caused by either their parent compounds or transformation products. This study compares ultraviolet (UV)-based advanced oxidation processes (UV/hydrogen peroxide, UV/persulfate, and UV/chlorine) for the abatement of an antihistamine drug epinastine. UV light at 254 nm was irradiated upon solutions containing 10 μM epinastine and 100 μM oxidant. UV/chlorine degraded epinastine most effectively at pH 6.0-8.0; considerable contributions by reactive chlorine species and hydroxyl radicals were quantified using probe compounds. Furthermore, the degradation efficiency of the UV/chlorine treatment persisted with a halved chlorine dosage. Additionally, the types and concentrations of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) produced during UV/chlorine treatment with or without post-chlorination varied depending on the concentrations of chlorine or bromide. By comparing estimated DBP formations at a constant degradation rate of epinastine, UV/chlorine formed smaller concentrations of DBPs. Consequently, this study experimentally revealed that UV/chlorine is superior to UV/hydrogen peroxide and UV/persulfate for degrading epinastine at the possible pH and bromide content in the environment and controlling toxicological risks caused by disinfection DBPs formation by optimising chlorine dosage and UV fluence.