A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of low-dose rituximab versus immunosuppressants in refractory orbital inflammatory pseudotumors with intracranial extension. | LitMetric

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of low-dose rituximab (RTX) and immunosuppressants in treating orbital inflammatory pseudotumor (OIP) with intracranial extension, a refractory and high-relapse disease.

Methods: Patients who had been diagnosed with refractory OIP with intracranial extension and who were refractory to systemic corticosteroids were retrospectively recruited at the Neuro-Ophthalmology Department at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between December 2018 and September 2022. After methylprednisolone pulse therapy, we added 2 mg of tacrolimus per day, 1500 mg of mycophenolate mofetil per day, or 200 mg of rituximab at days 1 and 15, and then monitored those with CD19+ B cells of under 1% as adjuvant therapy.

Results: Eleven patients (six males and five females) were included, with a mean age of 45.5 ± 11.8 years (age range: 21-64 years). The average follow-up period was 3.8 years (range: 2-5). Eight patients (72.7%) had different levels of decreased vision at onset of the illness and four patients (36.4%) had severely impaired vision (three with no light perception, one with some light perception). Four patients (36.4%) showed clinical course worsening or lack of remission when treated with corticosteroids. Seven patients (63.6%) had a typical relapsing course, and the annual recurrence rate was higher than 7.36 ± 3.73 times. Of these seven, four (57.1%, 4/7) were able to undergo successful management with immunosuppressants. Three (42.9%, 3/7) failed with immunosuppressants but succeeded in controlling relapse with RTX.

Conclusion: OIP with intracranial extension is uncommon. More than half of patients with OIP with intracranial extension may be satisfactorily treated with corticosteroids combined with immunosuppressants. However, for patients who still experience recurrence or slow reduction of lesions after applying this combined therapy, RTX may be a better option.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802561PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1516909DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracranial extension
20
oip intracranial
16
efficacy low-dose
8
low-dose rituximab
8
orbital inflammatory
8
extension refractory
8
patients
8
patients 364%
8
light perception
8
treated corticosteroids
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!