A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Signature With Machine Learning for Differentiating Prognostic Subsets of Pediatric Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors: A Retrospective Study. | LitMetric

Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Signature With Machine Learning for Differentiating Prognostic Subsets of Pediatric Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors: A Retrospective Study.

Ultrasound Med Biol

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China; Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Structural & Functional Imaging, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. Electronic address:

Published: February 2025

Objective: To construct and select a better model based on ultrasonic-based radiomics features and clinical characteristics for prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors.

Methods: Data from 73 children with neuroblastic tumors were included and divided into a training group and a validation group. Data 1 contained the subjects' radiomics features and clinical characteristics, while data 2 contained radiomics features. With the help of machine learning, five models were constructed for data 1 and data 2, respectively. The model with the highest accuracy and area under the curve was selected as the combined model and radiomics model for data 1 and data 2, respectively. A superior model was then chosen from the models after further comparison.

Results: The extreme gradient-boosting model for data 1 was chosen as the combined model and the extreme gradient-boosting model for data 2 was chosen as the radiomics model. The area under the curve of the combined and radiomics models in the validation group was 0.941 and 0.918 (p = 0.6906). The balanced accuracy, kappa value and F1 score of the radiomics model (0.9045, 0.8091 and 0.9091, respectively) were higher than those of the combined model (0.8545, 0.7123 and 0.8696, respectively). The top eight features of the radiomics model included five first-order statistical features and three textural features, all of which were high-dimensional features.

Conclusion: Our study proved that the radiomics model outperformed the combined model at differentiating prognostic subsets of pediatric neuroblastic tumors. Additionally, we found that high-dimensional ultrasonic-based radiomics features surpassed other features and clinical characteristics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.01.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiomics model
20
radiomics features
16
combined model
16
model
14
ultrasonic-based radiomics
12
prognostic subsets
12
subsets pediatric
12
neuroblastic tumors
12
features clinical
12
clinical characteristics
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!